Patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting late at the hospital can be selected for endovascular thrombectomy by the presence of collateral flow on CT angiography (CTA), a new study shows.
The MR CLEAN-LATE trial found that patients selected for thrombectomy in this way had a greater chance of a better functional outcome than patients who did not receive endovascular therapy.
The study was presented today at the 14th World Stroke Congress in Singapore by study investigator Susanne Olthuis, MD, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Patients in the intervention group were more likely to show a benefit on the primary endpoint of modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days with a significant common odds ratio of 1.68, a finding that received applause from attendees of the plenary WSC session at which the study was presented.
"This means that patients treated with endovascular therapy in this trial had about a 1.7 times higher chance of achieving a better functional outcome at 90 days," Olthuis said.
"Selection based on collateral flow identifies an additional group of patients eligible for late-window endovascular therapy in addition to those eligible based on perfusion and clinical criteria," Olthuis concluded.
"We recommend implementation of collateral selection in routine clinical practice as it is time efficient. The CTA is already available, and it involves a low complexity assessment. The only distinction that needs to be made is whether or not there are any collaterals visible on CTA. If collaterals are absent or there is any doubt, then CT perfusion (CTP) imaging can still be used," she added.
Co-principal investigator Wim H. van Zwam, MD, interventional radiologist at Maastricht, commented on the results for theheart.org | Medscape Cardiology.
"My take-home message is that now in the late window we can select patients based on the presence of collaterals on CT angiography, which makes selection easier and faster and more widely available," he said.
"If any collaterals are seen — and that is easily done just by looking at the CTA scan — then the patient can be selected for endovascular treatment," van Zwam added. "We don't need to wait for calculations of core and penumbra volumes from the CTP scan. There will also be additional patients who can benefit from endovascular therapy who do not fulfill the CTP criteria but do have visible collaterals."
Explaining the background to the study, Olthuis noted that endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke is safe and effective if performed within 6 hours and the effect then diminishes over time. In the original trial of endovascular treatment, MR CLEAN, patients with higher collateral grades had more treatment benefit, leading to the hypothesis that the assessment of collateral blood flow could help identify patients who would still benefit in the late time window.
The current MR CLEAN-LATE trial therefore set out to compare safety and efficacy of endovascular therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation presenting within 6-24 hours from symptom onset with patients selected based on the presence of collateral flow on CTA.
At the time the trial was starting, the DAWN and DEFUSE 3 trials reported showing benefit of endovascular therapy in patients presenting in the late window who had been selected for endovascular treatment based on a combination of perfusion imaging and clinical criteria, so patients who fitted these criteria were also excluded from MR CLEAN-LATE as they would now be eligible for endovascular therapy under the latest clinical guidelines.
But the study continued, as "we believed collateral selection may still be able to identify an additional group of patients that may benefit from endovascular therapy in the late window," Olthuis said.
The trial randomly assigned 502 such patients with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of at least 2 and with collateral flow grades of 1 to 3 to receive endovascular therapy (intervention) or control.
Safety data showed a slightly but nonsignificantly higher mortality rate at 90 days in the control group (30%) vs 24% in the intervention group.
The rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) was higher in the intervention group (6.7%) vs 1.6% in the control group, but Olthuis pointed out that the rate of sICH in the intervention group was similar to that in the endovascular groups of the DAWN and DEFUSE 3 trials.
The primary endpoint — mRS score at 90 days — showed a shift toward better outcome in the intervention group, with an adjusted common odds ratio (acOR) of 1.68 (95% CI, 1.21 - 2.33).
The median mRS score in the intervention group was 3 (95% CI, 2 to 5) vs 4 (95% CI, 2 to 6) in the control group.
Secondary outcomes also showed benefits for the intervention group for the endpoints of mRS score 0-1 vs 2.6 (OR, 1.63); mRS 0-2 vs 3-6 (OR 1.54); and mRS 0-3 vs 4-6 (OR, 1.74).
In addition, NIHSS score was reduced by 17% at 24 hours and by 27% by 5-7 days or discharge in the intervention group. Recanalization at 24 hours was also improved in the intervention group (81% vs 52%) and infarct size was reduced by 32%.
Olthuis explained that collateral grade was defined as the amount of collateral flow in the affected hemisphere as a percentage of the contralateral site, with grade 0 correlating to an absence of collaterals (and these were the only patients excluded).
Grade 1 included patients with 50% or less collaterals, grade 2 more than 50%, and grade 3 excellent collaterals — around 100%. "We included grade 1, 2 and 3, and subgroup analysis suggested no treatment interactions between different collateral grades in the patients included," she said.
Van Zwam noted that there has been evidence from other studies suggesting that the presence of collateral flow could be used to select patients for late thrombectomy, but MR CLEAN-LATE is the first randomized trial to show this and provides confirmation that this strategy is valid.
"Our results show that patients can be selected with just standard CT angiography imaging and that CT perfusion is not necessary. This will make it easier and faster to select patients especially for centers in low-resource areas who do not yet have CT perfusion imaging," he commented.
"But even in centers where CT perfusion imaging is performed, these results should mean that we do not have to wait to analyze these results before going ahead with thrombectomy. It will also give us an additional tool, as some patients do not meet the criteria on perfusion imaging but still have identifiable collaterals and thus would now qualify for endovascular thrombectomy," he added.
Could Collateral Assessment Replace CT Perfusion?
Commenting on the MR CLEAN-LATE trial, Stefan Kiechl, MD, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria, who is co-chair of the World Stroke Congress scientific committee, said it was an "excellent study."
"This study does not rely on advanced imaging (eg, mismatch) and criteria can easily be interpreted on CT/CTA. If the study is published and all details are available this study may substantially ease endovascular therapy in the late time window," Kiechl told theheart.org | Medscape Cardiology.
Also commenting, Urs Fischer, MD, chairman of the department of neurology at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, who was not involved with MR CLEAN-LATE, said: "This is another study that has nicely shown that endovascular therapy in patients in the later time window is highly effective."
Fischer said he was not surprised by the results.
"I was expecting the trial to be positive," he said. "What we can say is that endovascular therapy in patients with proximal vessel occlusion is a very effective intervention — probably one of the most important interventions in the history of medicine — and now we have another subgroup to whom we can offer this therapy. So, this is an important study that will improve the outcome of many further patients."
Yvo Roos, MD, professor of acute neurology at University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, who was a MR CLEAN-LATE investigator, agreed that the trial has the potential to increase number of patients who can be treated with endovascular therapy.
But both Roos and Fischer were not convinced that collateral assessment would replace CT perfusion as the first-line choice in selecting patients for endovascular treatment.
"We need to see what kind of patients were included in the trial and what kind of perfusion imaging characteristics they had, to see how they compare with patients selected by perfusion imaging," Roos noted. "I think CT perfusion is here. But if the data shows that collateral score is better able to identify patients for endovascular treatment than CT perfusion, then this has the potential to change practice. But that needs to be shown."
All patients screened for the MR CLEAN-LATE trial also received CT perfusion imaging as part of the standard imaging protocol, and many were selected for endovascular therapy directly on this basis, so would not have entered the trial. The researchers plan to analyze these results and to compare how the two approaches differ.
MR CLEAN-LATE is an investigator-driven study, funded by the Dutch Heart Foundation, the Brain Foundation Netherlands, and Medtronic. The study was designed and conducted, analyzed, and interpreted by the investigators independently of all sponsors. Olthuis reports no relevant financial relationships.
14th World Stroke Congress. Presented October 27, 2022.
Lead image: iStock/Getty Images
Medscape Medical News © 2022 WebMD, LLC
Send news tips to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Cite this: Collateral Flow Flags Stroke Patients for Late Thrombectomy: MR CLEAN-LATE - Medscape - Oct 27, 2022.