Find the latest COVID-19 news and guidance in Medscape's Coronavirus Resource Center.
As hospitals across the country develop their plans to vaccinate their healthcare employees against COVID-19, a key question has come to the fore: What if an employee — whether nurse, physician, or other healthcare worker — refuses to receive the vaccine? Can hospitals require their employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19? And what consequences could an employee face for refusing the vaccine?
My answer needs to be based, in part, on the law related to previous vaccines — influenza, for example — because at the time of this writing (early December 2020), no vaccine for COVID-19 has been approved, although approval of at least one vaccine is expected within a week. So there have been no offers of vaccine and refusals yet, nor are there any cases to date involving an employee who refused a COVID-19 vaccine. As of December 2020, there are no state or federal laws that either require an employee to be vaccinated against COVID-19 or that protect an employee who refuses vaccination against COVID-19. It will take a while after the vaccine is approved and distributed before refusals, reactions, policies, cases, and laws begin to emerge.
If we look at the law related to healthcare workers refusing to be vaccinated against the closest relative to COVID-19 — influenza — then the answer would be yes, employers can require employees to be vaccinated.
An employer can fire an employee who refuses influenza vaccination. If an employee who refused and was fired sues the employer for wrongful termination, the employee has more or less chance of success depending on the reason for refusal. Some courts and the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) have held that a refusal on religious grounds is protected by the US Constitution, as in this recent case. The Constitution protects freedom to practice one's religion. Specific religions may have a range of tenets that support refusal to be vaccinated.
A refusal on medical grounds has been successful if the medical grounds fall under the protections of the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA) but may fail when the medical grounds for the claim are not covered by the ADA.
Refusal for secular, nonmedical reasons, such as a healthcare worker's policy of treating their body as their temple, has not gone over well with employers or courts. However, in at least one case, a nurse who refused vaccination on secular, nonmedical grounds won her case against her employer, on appeal. The appeals court found that the hospital violated her First Amendment rights.
Employees who refuse vaccination for religious or medical reasons still will need to take measures to protect patients and other employees from infection. An employer such as a hospital can, rather than fire the employee, offer the employee an accommodation, such as requiring that the employee wear a mask or quarantine. There are no cases that have upheld an employee's right to refuse to wear a mask or quarantine.
The situation with the COVID-19 vaccine is different from the situation surrounding influenza vaccines. There are plenty of data on effectiveness and side effects of influenza vaccines, but there is very little evidence of short- or long-term effects of the COVID-19 vaccines currently being tested and/or considered for approval. One could argue that the process of vaccine development is the same for all virus vaccines. However, public confidence in the vaccine vetting process is not what it once was. It has been widely publicized that the COVID-19 vaccine trials have been rushed. As of December 2020, only 60% of the general population say they would take the vaccine, although researchers say confidence is increasing.
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has designated healthcare workers as first in line to get the vaccine, but some healthcare workers may not want to be the first to try it. A CDC survey found that 63% of healthcare workers polled in recent months said they would get a COVID-19 vaccine.
Unions have entered the conversation. A coalition of unions that represent healthcare workers said, "We need a transparent, evidence-based federal vaccine strategy based on principles of equity, safety, and priority, as well as robust efforts to address a high degree of skepticism about safety of an authorized vaccine." The organization declined to promote a vaccine until more is known.
As of publication date, the EEOC guidance for employers responding to COVID-19 does not address vaccines.
The CDC's Interim Guidance for Businesses and Employers Responding to Coronavirus Disease 2019, May 2020, updated December 4, 2020, does not address vaccines. The CDC's page on COVID-19 vaccination for healthcare workers does not address a healthcare worker's refusal. The site does assure healthcare workers that the vaccine development process is sound: "The current vaccine safety system is strong and robust, with the capacity to effectively monitor COVID-19 vaccine safety. Existing data systems have validated analytic methods that can rapidly detect statistical signals for possible vaccine safety problems. These systems are being scaled up to fully meet the needs of the nation. Additional systems and data sources are also being developed to further enhance safety monitoring capabilities. CDC is committed to ensuring that COVID-19 vaccines are safe."
In the coming months, government officials and vaccine manufacturers will be working to reassure the public of the safety of the vaccine and the rigor of the vaccine development process. In November 2020, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr Anthony Fauci told Kaiser Health News: "The company looks at the data. I look at the data. Then the company puts the data to the FDA. The FDA will make the decision to do an emergency use authorization or a license application approval. And they have career scientists who are really independent. They're not beholden to anybody. Then there's another independent group, the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee. The FDA commissioner has vowed publicly that he will go according to the opinion of the career scientists and the advisory board." President-elect Joe Biden said he would get a vaccine when Fauci thinks it is safe.
An employee who, after researching the vaccine and the process, still wants to refuse when offered the vaccine is not likely to be fired for that reason right away, as long as the employee takes other precautions, such as wearing a mask. If the employer does fire the employee and the employee sues the employer, it is impossible to predict how a court would decide the case.
Related legal questions may arise in the coming months. For example:
Is an employer exempt from paying workers' compensation to an employee who refuses to be vaccinated and then contracts the virus while on the job?
Can a prospective employer require COVID-19 vaccination as a pre-condition of employment?
Is it within a patient's rights to receive an answer to the question: Has my healthcare worker been vaccinated against COVID-19?
If a hospital allows employees to refuse vaccination and keep working, and an outbreak occurs, and it is suggested through contact tracing that unvaccinated workers infected patients, will a court hold the hospital liable for patients' damages?
Answers to these questions are yet to be determined.
Carolyn Buppert (www.buppert.com) is an attorney and former nurse practitioner who focuses on the legal issues affecting nurse practitioners.
Medscape Infectious Diseases © 2020 WebMD, LLC
Any views expressed above are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the views of WebMD or Medscape.
Cite this: Can a Healthcare Worker Refuse the COVID-19 Vaccine? - Medscape - Dec 09, 2020.