Bone Development in Transgender Adolescents Treated With GnRH Analogues and Subsequent Gender-affirming Hormones

Sebastian E. E. Schagen; Femke M. Wouters; Peggy T. Cohen-Kettenis; Louis J. Gooren; Sabine E. Hannema

Disclosures

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(12) 

In This Article

Methods

Subjects and Protocol

Subjects were adolescents fulfilling Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for gender identity disorder (the term used at the time)[11] and eligible for treatment according to existing guidelines at that time.[4,12,13] The design of the study was observational and prospective, and individuals were included from 1998 to 2009. The first phase of treatment consisted of intramuscular injections of GnRHa 3.75 mg (Triptorelin-CR (Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Denmark). The first 2 injections were administered with a 2-week interval followed by injections every 4 weeks to suppress endogenous sex steroid production. To induce female pubertal development in transgirls, oral estrogens were prescribed in an increasing dosage over a period of 2 years as previously described.[4] Male puberty in transboys was induced by administering Sustanon (a mixture of testosterone propionate, -fenylpropionate, -isocaproate and -decanoate) intramuscularly in increasing doses over a period of 2 years.[14] In subjects who were 16 years of age or older at the start of pubertal suppression, gender-affirming hormones were started at half the adult dose and increased to the adult dose after 6 months. A dose of 2 mg 17beta-estradiol per day and 125 mg testosterone-esters per 2 weeks was considered an adult dose. From 45 subjects, some data were also included in previous studies by Vlot et al[8] and Klink et al,[10] but those studies only reported results at 3 time points: at the start of GnRHa, at the start of gender-affirming hormones, and after 2 years of gender-affirming hormones[8] or age 22 years,[10] and they did not describe a detailed course of BMD and bone markers over several years of GnRHa or gender-affirming hormone treatment.

Different effects of treatment might be expected depending on the pubertal stage at baseline. A previous study used a bone age cutoff of 14 and 15 years for transboys and transgirls, respectively, to define early- and late-pubertal groups.[8] However, especially for transboys, bone age 14 years signifies the final stages of puberty and near completion of linear growth rather than midpuberty. In the current study, Tanner stage was used to define early- and late-pubertal groups, with the early-pubertal group defined as Tanner stage 2 or 3 at the start of GnRHa treatment, and the late-pubertal group as Tanner stage 4 or 5.

Bone Densitometry

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was performed before GnRHa administration and then every subsequent year using Hologic QDR 4500 (Holologic Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Likewise, at the start of gender-affirming hormone treatment, a DXA scan was performed, with yearly measurements thereafter. Areal BMD (aBMD, g/cm2) of the lumbar spine, nondominant hip, and whole body, as well as the bone mineral content of the whole body (BMC-WB, g) were measured. To calculate z-scores based on age and sex, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) references values were used. Because changes in aBMD might partly be due to altered growth during treatment, we also studied BMAD (g/cm3) calculated as described by Ward et al.[15] BMAD z-scores were calculated using LMS data from an English reference population.[15] To calculate z-scores the reference population of the birth-assigned sex was used. For adolescents older than 17 years no reference values of BMAD are available; therefore, reference values of 17 year-olds were used to calculate the z-score at older ages.[15]

Serum Bone Markers

Markers of bone formation (P1NP, P3NP, and osteocalcin) and of bone resorption (1CTP) were determined in fasting blood samples, drawn before noon on the same days as the DXA scans, and stored at −20 °C.

Osteocalcin was measured by an immunometric assay (Colorimetric, BioSource, Nivelles, Belgium) (lower detection limit of 0.4 nmol/L; inter-assay coefficient of variation (CV) for the whole range <10%). Serum 1CTP, P1NP, and P3NP levels were measured using a radioimmunoassay (Orion Diagnostica, Espoo, Finland). The lower ranges of detection were 1 μg/L for 1CTP, 5 μg/L for P1NP, and 1μg/L for P3NP. The inter-assay CV for the whole range of 1CTP was 7% and for P1NP 8%. The CV for P3NP was 6% at 4.2 μg/L and 8% at 6.2 μg/L.

Statistical Analyses

Independent t tests were used to ascertain differences between the ages of the transgirls and transboys. To analyze changes in BMAD over time, data were analyzed using a linear mixed model. A full factorial model was chosen as fixed part of the model, ie, a model consisting of time (3 or 4 levels), pubertal stage (early/late), and sex and all possible interactions (ie, three 2-way and one 3-way interactions). An unstructured covariance matrix was used as random part of the model. An advantage of the linear mixed model approach above traditional repeated measurements analysis of variance (ANOVA) is that all acquired data are included in the analyses and no data are lost due to incomplete data sets.

Differences in aBMD during a more prolonged period of GnRHa treatment were calculated using the related samples Wilcoxon Signed Ranked test.

All data on BMAD, and z-scores are presented as estimated marginal means and standard error of the mean. The statistical package was SPSS 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Ethical Approval

The study was placed on the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number register and ascribed registration number ISRCTN 81574253 (www.isrctn.com). Approval by the local medical ethical committee was obtained. Informed consent for the study was obtained from all adolescents, and if aged <18 years also from their parents.

Comments

3090D553-9492-4563-8681-AD288FA52ACE

processing....