Plain Water Better Than Hand Sanitizer for Influenza A

Troy Brown, RN

September 23, 2019

Simple handwashing — even without soap — is more effective than many hand disinfectants for killing influenza A virus (IAV) in typical clinical situations, new data show.

The researchers say the key factor that determines the effectiveness of ethanol-based disinfectants (EBDs) is whether there is wet mucus surrounding the virus. Wet mucus prevents the disinfectant from reaching the virus, which means the virus remained active after 120 seconds of EBD exposure.

By contrast, washing hands under plain water for 30 seconds inactivated the virus, regardless of whether it was initially surrounded by wet or dry mucus.

"The physical properties of mucus protect the virus from inactivation," lead researcher Ryohei Hirose, PhD, MD, a physician and molecular gastroenterologist at Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine in Japan, said in a news release. "Until the mucus has completely dried, infectious IAV can remain on the hands and fingers, even after appropriate antiseptic hand rubbing."

Hirose and colleagues published their findings online September 18 in mSphere.

For the study, they first looked at the physical properties of mucus and found that ethanol travels more slowly through the thick, sticky substance than it does through saline, which has similar properties as plain water.

Next, the researchers attempted to simulate clinical situations in which healthcare professionals might transmit the virus: they collected sputum for IAV-infected patients and applied it to human fingers. After being exposed to an EBD for 2 minutes, the IAV was still active in the mucus on participants' fingertips. The virus was deactivated by 4 minutes.

If, however, the researchers allowed the mucus to fully dry on participants' hands before they used EBD, the hand sanitizer quickly inactivated the virus.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization recommend using disinfectants such as EBDs for 15 to 30 seconds. "However, our results suggest that this disinfection time is insufficient for the disinfection of infectious mucus of IAV-infected patients adhered to the fingers/hands and that current contact infection prevention and [antiseptic hand rubbing] regimens using EBDs are not sufficient to prevent IAV outbreaks," the researchers write.

The findings challenge those of previous studies, most of which have tested EBDs on dry mucus.

Given their results, the authors recommend actually washing hands and not simply rubbing them with hand disinfectant.

The study authors have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

mSphere. Published online September 18, 2019. Full text

Follow Medscape on FacebookTwitterInstagram, and YouTube

Comments

3090D553-9492-4563-8681-AD288FA52ACE
Comments on Medscape are moderated and should be professional in tone and on topic. You must declare any conflicts of interest related to your comments and responses. Please see our Commenting Guide for further information. We reserve the right to remove posts at our sole discretion.
Post as:

processing....