Conclusion
This extensive systematic review with meta-analyses advances the literature as the most up to date, rigorous synthesis of peer-reviewed literature, which has investigated the effect of the COCP and metformin on clinical, hormonal and metabolic features of PCOS, in both adolescents and adults. It addresses key gaps on the role of these agents in PCOS and the role of metformin. We confirm that COCP therapy for women with PCOS improves hyperandrogenism and menstrual regulation. No type of COCP is adequately proven as superior, and aligned with general population recommendations and side effect profiles, higher dose oestrogen preparations should not be first line and lower dose preparations are recommended. We clarify the role of metformin alone or in combination with COCP showing it is useful for the management of metabolic features of PCOS specifically weight, hormonal and metabolic outcomes, especially in women with PCOS with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2. We have directly informed international guideline recommendations and identified research gaps, including the need for additional high-quality RCTs to define optimal type and dose of both COCPs and metformin and to assess their impact on quality of life in PCOS.
Acknowledgements
We thank Estifanos Baye and Ching Shan Wan for assisting with the data extraction and critical appraisals of studies included in this review. Ben W. Mol supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (GNT1082548). BWM reports consultancy for ObsEva, Merck Merck KGaA and Guerbet. Michael Costello provided shares in Virtus Health and past sponsorship from Merck Serono for conference presentations.
Data Accessibility
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and the technical report of the international PCOS guideline, available at https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/1412282/PCOS-Guideline_Technical-report.pdf.
Funding information
The guideline was primarily funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) supported by a partnership with the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guideline development group members did not receive payment. Guideline evidence synthesis staff received salary from the institution (MM and ET). Travel expenses were covered by the sponsoring organizations.
Clin Endocrinol. 2019;91(4):479-489. © 2019 Blackwell Publishing
Comments