COMMENTARY

Survival of the Slimiest: The Persistent Nature of Biofilms

Sonali D. Advani, MD, MBBS, MPH

Disclosures

March 22, 2018

Editorial Collaboration

Medscape &

The Role of Biofilm in Nosocomial Transmission

Biofilms are sessile microbial communities growing on surfaces, frequently embedded in a matrix of extracellular polymeric substances (also known as slime). Suboptimal environmental cleaning and reprocessing of instruments is a common problem in healthcare facilities, allowing for biofilm formation and risk for nosocomial transmission. Three recent articles[1,2,3] highlight how our understanding of bacterial persistence and recent advances in disinfection modalities may provide a means for control of biofilms and nosocomial infections.

No Wet Surface? No Problem

Bravo and colleagues[1] investigated the ability of Acinetobacter pittii strains to form biofilms after long-term desiccation if they were fed with nutrient media. Five strains of A pittii were inoculated on white laboratory coat fragments, glass, and plastic or into sterile saline and monitored at room temperature for a period of 43 days. Biofilm formation and bacterial viability during the survival analysis were assessed. The culturability of the A pittii strains decreased by 77.3%, 80.9%, 68.1%, and 14.5% for white coat, plastic, glass, and saline, respectively. However, 85.6% of these populations retained their culturability in saline solution. Despite the reduction in culturability over time, all strains that recovered from starvation on solid-surface experiments retained their capacity to form biofilms after rehydration, an addition of nutrients, and changing temperature. These findings are consistent with a tendency of other Acinetobacter species to survive on dry surfaces, form biofilms, and contribute to nosocomial outbreaks.

How Hidden Biofilms Escape Disinfection

Alfa and colleagues[2] looked at the impact of improper positioning of the elevator lever of a duodenoscope on bacterial persistence, biofilm formation, and endoscope contamination. Duodenoscope levers were inoculated with 108 CFU/mL Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis and subsequently sampled after high-level disinfection (HLD). The automated endoscope reprocessor (AER) did not provide the expected 6 Log10 kill with the elevator lever in the incorrect position (not at 45º as instructed by the manufacturer), regardless of whether the AER had a cleaning cycle. These data highlight the persistence of bacteria despite HLD due to the narrow margin of safety with lever positioning in endoscope reprocessing.

'You Missed a Spot'

In the third study, Mustapha and colleagues[3] conducted a small-scale blinded experiment to study the impact of an additive on the efficacy and visibility of disinfectants during the cleaning process. The chemical additive used was Highlight solution (Kinnos Inc; Brooklyn, New York), which temporarily colorizes chlorine-based disinfectants and fades to undetectable within approximately 5 minutes when applied to surfaces. In this study, nine healthcare personnel were randomly assigned to assess surfaces 30 seconds and 3 minutes after bleach application with and without Highlight. For non-black surfaces, people were more likely to correctly identify suboptimal disinfectant application when Highlight was used. The data showed that addition of Highlight to chlorine-based disinfectants increased the ability of personnel to identify high-touch surfaces with suboptimal application of disinfectant.

Comments

3090D553-9492-4563-8681-AD288FA52ACE
Comments on Medscape are moderated and should be professional in tone and on topic. You must declare any conflicts of interest related to your comments and responses. Please see our Commenting Guide for further information. We reserve the right to remove posts at our sole discretion.
Post as:

processing....