PPIs May Increase Risk for Chronic, Silent Kidney Damage

Nicola M. Parry, DVM

February 23, 2017

Among new users of PPIs, more than half of those who go on to develop chronic kidney damage while taking the medication have no signs of acute kidney injury (AKI) beforehand, a new study shows.

Yan Xie, MPH, from Veterans Affairs (VA) Saint Louis Health Care System, Missouri, and colleagues published the results of their study online February 22 in Kidney International.

"[W]e show that among new users of acid suppression therapy, incident PPI users have increased risk of chronic renal outcomes including incident [chronic kidney disease (CKD)], CKD progression, and [end-stage renal disease (ESRD)] in the absence of intervening AKI," the authors write.

"Reliance on antecedent AKI as [a] warning sign to guard against risk of developing CKD and progression to ESRD among PPI users is not sufficient as a sole risk mitigation strategy. Exercising vigilance in PPI use — even in the absence of AKI — and careful attention to kidney function in PPI users may be a reasonable approach."

PPI treatment is known to increase the risk for AKI, acute interstitial nephritis, and CKD. However, whether PPI use is tied to a greater risk for chronic kidney damage in the absence of an earlier episode of AKI has been unclear.

Xie and colleagues therefore investigated whether PPI-related CKD and other chronic renal outcomes are mediated only by the occurrence of AKI.

Using the US Department of VA databases, the researchers analyzed data on 125,596 new users of PPIs and 18,436 new users of histamine H2 receptor agonists (H2 blockers). They followed the patients for 5 years to compare renal outcomes between the two groups.

Compared with new users of H2 blockers, new users of PPIs had a greater risk of having an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 60 mL/minute/1.73 m2 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.15 - 1.24), incident CKD (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.20 - 1.33), a greater than 30% decrease in eGFR (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.16 - 1.28), and ESRD or a greater than 50% decrease in eGFR (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.15 - 1.48), after adjusting for demographic factors and numerous comorbidities.

In addition, 18.24% of new PPI users developed AKI during this time compared with 12.67% of new users of H2 blockers.

When the researchers excluded those patients with AKI from their multivariable models, PPI users still had an excess risk for chronic renal outcomes compared with those taking H2 blockers. Specifically, their risk was 22% higher for incident eGFR less than 60 mL/minute/1.73 m2 (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.17 - 1.27), 29% higher for CKD (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.22 - 1.36), 26% higher for a greater than 30% decrease in eGFR (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.19 - 1.32), and 35% higher for ESRD or a greater than 50% decrease in eGFR (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.19 - 1.53).

In each case, the researchers calculated that slightly less than half (44.7% - 46.7%) of the risk for the chronic kidney conditions was mediated by AKI.

These results suggest that PPI use is associated with increased risk for chronic renal damage in patients who have not experienced AKI beforehand.

In an interview with Medscape Medical News, Robert Albright, DO, chair of nephrology and hypertension at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, was more cautious in drawing conclusions from the data.

He noted that compared with the group using H2 blockers, PPIs users had many more comorbidities, which are also associated with renal outcomes. "And we do not get any information on other medications or non-AKI events which might have occurred, which also could have been associated with poor, long-term renal outcomes." Other important information is also lacking, he said, including the duration of PPI treatment.

In addition, Dr Albright highlighted that the study did not include a comparison group of non-PPI users in this VA cohort, with similar comorbidities. "It is a retrospective white VA cohort, with the inherent biases which prevent generalizability."

Nevertheless, Dr Albright stressed the benefit of directing attention to PPI use, which has become routine, rather than medically indicated, "particularly with the increased risks of Clostridium difficile infection with PPI use as well," he concluded.

This study was funded by a grant from the US Department of Veterans Affairs. The authors and Dr Albright have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Kidney Int. Published online February 22, 2017. Full text

For more news, join us on Facebook and Twitter

Comments

3090D553-9492-4563-8681-AD288FA52ACE
Comments on Medscape are moderated and should be professional in tone and on topic. You must declare any conflicts of interest related to your comments and responses. Please see our Commenting Guide for further information. We reserve the right to remove posts at our sole discretion.
Post as:

processing....