Discussion
These results reveal incomplete discussion and documentation of dietary supplements during primary care office visits with older adults. Although it may be unrealistic to expect dietary supplement discussions to occur during every office visit, it is surprising that there was such incomplete documentation of supplement use. Poor documentation of supplements discussed during office visits may reflect provider ambivalence about the importance of documenting supplement use.
The importance of full disclosure of an individual's dietary supplements is debatable because many may be unlikely to cause adverse events or supplement–drug interactions.[7] More vigilance might be expected with dietary supplements that have potential drug–supplement interactions, but the current study did not find significant differences in supplement discussion or documentation based on whether supplements were NVNM supplements (more likely to have potential interactions or adverse events)[3,8] or supplements considered to be more benign, such as vitamins and minerals.[7,9] The study examined medical records over a 12-month period, so it was not possible to assess documentation of supplement use on the day of audio-recorded visits.
Given the lack of awareness about potential adverse effects of dietary supplements and about drug–supplement interactions, physicians may need to ask patients proactively about supplement use. Greater physician education about the potential risks of dietary supplements may be needed to enhance awareness of the importance of assessing and documenting supplement use[10] and to ensure patient safety.
Acknowledgments
Conflict of Interest
The editor in chief has reviewed the conflict of interest checklist provided by the authors and has determined that the authors have no financial or any other kind of personal conflicts with this paper.
Data used in this study were collected with the support of a University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Mentored Clinical Scientist Development Award (5K12AG001004) and by the UCLA Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center funded by the National Institute on Aging (5P30 AG028748).
Author Contributions
Jang: study concept and design, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting and revising of manuscript. Tarn: study concept and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting and revising of manuscript.
Sponsor's Role
The funding agencies had no explicit role in the design, methods, subject recruitment, data collection, data analysis, or preparation of this manuscript. The manuscript content does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute on Aging or the National Institutes of Health.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(7):1386-1388. © 2014 Blackwell Publishing