Are E-Cigarettes the Answer?

Maybe these devices called e-cigarettes? They produce a high nicotine content vapor that's inhaled and is reported to produce a serious nicotine rush, similar to that produced by inhaling smoke from burning tobacco.

Sounds pretty good.

Because tobacco deaths don't come from nicotine, maybe we could rescue some 450,000 Americans a year from premature death secondary to tobacco use by making e-cigarettes available to tobacco addicts.

Yeah. Maybe we could. That would be called harm reduction. It could also be called compassionate therapy. Who could oppose that? A lot of folks are antitobacco zealots and they say to the tobacco addicts, "Quit or die!" Ooh. Huge numbers can't quit, so they die, prematurely.

Have the e-cigs been subjected to a great deal of short- and long-term scientific scrutiny? Not yet. Well, they should be.

There are many regulatory hurdles awaiting e-cigarettes on their way toward approval, including success at smoking cessation; potential toxicity for the user; any possible harm to people nearby the user; the potential for developing new nicotine addicts via this method of nicotine delivery; possible destigmatization of tobacco; age limits; and the best ways to advertise, market, sell, and tax this new family of products.

Meanwhile, we the public and we the public-health folks ought to cool it and just let the tobacco addicts, who are going to get their nicotine rush any way they can, use e-cigs rather than burn tobacco and inhale its smoke. It strikes me as immoral to try to prevent them that access. Right? Right.

That's my opinion. I'm Dr. George Lundberg, at large for Medscape.


Comments on Medscape are moderated and should be professional in tone and on topic. You must declare any conflicts of interest related to your comments and responses. Please see our Commenting Guide for further information. We reserve the right to remove posts at our sole discretion.
Post as: