Author(s) |
Purpose of the Study |
Country |
Methodology |
Sample Characteristics |
Results |
Brodsky10 |
To examine the experience of testicular cancer treatment of young men |
United States |
Qualitative interviews Ethnographic design |
11 men History of nonseminomatous testicular cancer |
1. Feelings of disbelief and despair. 2. Physical and emotional trauma. 3. Renewed appreciation for life. 4. Stages of treatment. |
Cecil et al11 |
To identify sociological issues of concern that present challenges to masculinity and to male identity |
Northern Ireland |
Qualitative interviews Thematic analysis |
8 men History of cancer and no longer being treated Age at diagnosis: 36–70 y |
1. Their lives had been changed by the experience o f having cancer. 2. Financial and employment issues. 3. Changed role within family and community. 4. Body changes and body image. |
Chapple et al12 |
To explore fertility issues for young men who had been diagnosed and treated for cancer and to examine communication problems |
United Kingdom |
Qualitative interviews Narrative design |
18 men Age at interview: 16–26 y |
1. The importance of choice. 2. The need for more counseling. 3. Concerns about sperm banking. 4. Feelings about possible infertility. |
Elmberger et al13 |
To gain an understanding of men's experience of how cancer affects the role of a father |
Sweden |
Qualitative interviews Interpretive descriptive design |
8 men History of blood cancer Age at diagnosis: 35–54 y |
5. Transition in self-image. 6. Dealing with the changed father's role. 7. Attempts to gain control. 8. Attempts to balance emotions. 9. Sharing knowledge. 10. Meeting the challenge in family life. 11. Strive for family well-being. |
Helseth and Ulfsaet14 |
To assess parenting experiences to understand the main challenges involved in parenting young children when a parent has cancer |
Norway |
Qualitative interviews Exploratory design |
10 families 3 fathers; 7 mothers with cancer and spouses Age of children: 0–18 y |
1. Aim of parenting: to be ''good'' parents, protect the children, make situation secure/normal. 2. Strategies for parenting during illness. |
Hilton et al15 |
To compare men's and women's accounts of chemotherapy-induced alopecia |
United Kingdom |
Qualitative secondary analysis of narrative interviews |
37 participants 16 men, 21 women Age at diagnosis (men): 18–34 y |
1. Similarities in experience of alopecia between men and women a. Alopecia forced participants to confront cancer experience publicly; feelings of vulnerability result. b. Anticipate negative reactions from others. 2. Differences in experience of alopecia between men and women. a. Men concerned with looking less macho. b. Men described the experience of losing hair from entire body, not restricted to publicly visible hair loss. c. Women spoke of being encouraged to disguise alopecia. 3. Exceptions: 2 men, 1 woman seemed untroubled by alopecia. |
Hilton et al16 |
To compare young adults' experiences of disclosing a cancer diagnosis |
United Kingdom |
Qualitative secondary analysis of narrative interviews |
37 participants 16 men, 21 women Age at diagnosis (men): 18–34 y |
1. Tell loved ones about the cancer diagnosis. 2. Gendered identity and disclosure of a cancer diagnosis. |
Hou et al17 |
To examine how Chinese patients with colorectal cancer dynamically adapt to diagnosis and treatment and to explore how patients evolve and deploy different resources throughout the illness trajectory |
China |
Qualitative semistructured interviews Grounded theory design |
16 participants 10 men, 6 women Age at diagnosis (men): 44–68 y |
1. Utilization of medical resources. a. Making sense of an illness. 2. Transition of resource utilization. a. Adaptive coping. b. Resource deployment. 3. Continuous resistance to demands. a. Shaping personal resources. b. Regaining mastery. c. Developing social resources. d. Deteriorating social resources. 4. Toward recovery. a. Uncertain threat from possible recurrence. b. Remaining positive. |
Mesquita et al18 |
To describe the experience of cancer treatment from the perspective of Brazilian men receiving chemotherapy for various cancers |
Brazil |
Qualitative cross-sectional descriptive study Thematic analysis |
12 men Age at diagnosis: 29–77 y |
1. Life before cancer: macho profile. 2. Cancer treatment: time to reprioritize. 3. After treatment: becoming different. |
Parsons et al19 |
To examine the relationship between experiences of osteosarcoma illness and experiences of vocation |
Canada |
Qualitative interviews Narrative design |
14 participants 8 men, 6 women History of osteosarcoma Age at diagnosis: 16–35 y |
1. Osteosarcoma illness represented a crisis. 2. Participants engaged in illness work, identity work, and vocational work. These forms of work were interconnected. 3. Illness was a transformative experience for participants. |
Schmidt et al20 |
To determine to what extent sexual function was influenced by surgery, gender, and age in patients with rectal cancer |
Germany |
Quantitative prospective study Questionnaire at 6 points in time |
495 participants with quality-of-life data 257 men, 238 women Diagnosed with rectal cancer Average age: 66.8 y Age groups: 40–50, 51–60, 61–70, 71–80, and 980 y |
1. Quality of life changes after surgery. 2. Type of surgery, gender, and age impact sexual function and sexual enjoyment. 3. Men experience more strain than women do through impaired sexual enjoyment. 4. Men aged e69 y experience more stress through deteriorated sexual function than older groups do. |
Schmitt et al21 |
To examine factors associated with family functioning in a sample of cancer patient families with 4- to 17-y-old children and to compare it with a community sample |
Finland: multisite, 8 European countries |
Quantitative cross-sectional study Questionnaire |
Age of children: 4–17 y 85 families 22 ill fathers, 63 ill mothers.] |
1. No differences between clinical sample and control group regarding the factors associated with family functioning. 2. Increase in impairment of family functioning with the mother in the family was depressed (ill or not). 3. Two-parent family associated with higher family functioning. 4. Male family members perceived family functioning as being worse than female family members did. |
Schover et al22 |
To determine male patients' knowledge, attitudes, and experiences regarding cancer-related infertility and sperm banking |
United States |
Quantitative Survey |
201 men Age at diagnosis: 14–40 y |
1. Parental status and concerns about infertility. 2. Genetic issues. 3. Knowledge about cancer-related infertility. 4. Attitudes about being a parent after cancer. |
Seale and Charteris-Black23 |
To examine the experiences of cancer among 3 different age groups |
United Kingdom |
Qualitative secondary analysis of matched narrative interviews Comparative keyword analysis |
102 interviews 51 men, 51 women 3 subgroups formed by age Age ranges of men: young (16–26 y), mid (40–54 y), older (65–82 y) |
1. Older men demonstrated a greater involvement with medicine as an expert system compared with younger men. 2. Older men were less likely to draw on informal social and family networks for support than younger men were. |
Semple and McCance24 |
Explore the experience of parents diagnosed with head and neck cancer who are caring for young children |
Northern Ireland |
Qualitative interviews Analysis via cognitive mapping |
12 participants 10 fathers, 2 mothers Head and neck cancer diagnosis Age of children: 0–15 y |
3. At diagnosis Parents are aware of impact on family and the developmental stage of children. Parents fear death and missing milestones. Parents fear telling children (protecting children). 4. During treatment Effects of hospital stay: separation, preparing children for visit. Effect of treatment on family life: physical/social/sexual/psychological challenges. Changing roles within family. 5. Living with the consequences of having cancer. Reestablishing routine. Living with uncertainty.>br/> Appreciation of life as a parent. |
Zucca et al25 |
To assess the prevalence and predictors of the use of coping strategies in a population of long-term cancer survivors 5–6 y after diagnosis |
Australia |
Quantitative cross-sectional study Survey |
863 long-term survivors 391 men, 472 women Age range of men: 18–75 y (9% aged 18–39 y; 18% aged 40–49 y) |
1. Use of coping strategies: fatalism, fighting spirit, cognitive avoidance, anxious preoccupation, helplessness-hopelessness. 2. 45% of survivors were not classified as ''cases'' on these 5 coping subscales. 3. Predictors of coping. 4. Predictors of maladaptive coping. 5. Gender and family composition. |