Vaccination for Hepatitis C Virus

Closing in on an Evasive Target

John Halliday; Paul Klenerman; Eleanor Barnes

Expert Rev Vaccines. 2011;10(5):659-672.

Five-year View

There are several promising vaccine trials currently recruiting patients that will undoubtedly further expand our understanding of the complex interplay of HCV and host immunity and our ability to modulate this in favor of the host. New therapeutic HCV vaccine approaches are likely to continue to be explored in combination with standard medical therapy rather than in isolation. The new directly acting viral protease inhibitors that will become available in the next few years will further influence this process. While these drugs will improve treatment outcomes for patients with HCV genotype-1 infection, their high cost will limit availability. Approaches for nongenotype-1 strains also need some consideration given the major genetic divergence of the six major genotypes and their distinct immunoreactivity.

Vaccines that produce substantial antiviral T-cell responses are being developed, but in the absence of a clear correlate of protection, efficacy will need to be demonstrated in well-designed clinical trials. The organization and monitoring of these is a substantial issue for the field, but moves to harmonize studies of at-risk and acutely infected cohorts might accelerate this process.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Next Section

Financial & competing interests disclosure
Eleanor Barnes is funded by the Medical Research Council (MRC) UK and the Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. John Halliday is funded by the MRC UK and Paul Klenerman is funded by the Wellcome Trust UK. The authors are currently working on Phase I HCV vaccine studies using adenoviral vectors in collaboration with an industrial partner Okairos. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.
No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Cite this: Vaccination for Hepatitis C Virus - Medscape - May 01, 2011.

Table 1. Recombinant protein hepatitis C vaccine studies.
Structure (Investigator)	Phase (year)	Subjects	Outcome	Ref.
HCV E1 + alum adjuvant (Innogenetics/GenImmune)	I (2003)	20 healthy volunteers + 34 HCV-infected, treatment-naive patients	Well tolerated. No HCV viral load change. 50 out of 54 patient T-cell response. Humoral response correlated with improvement in ALT and liver histology	[77,78]
	II (2008)	122 HCV-infected patients randomized (3:1)	Well tolerated. Induced humoral and cellular immune responses. No change in histological progression of liver disease over 3 years	[79]
HCV E1/E2 glycoproteins/MF59C adjuvant (Novartis)	I (2010)	60 healthy volunteers	Well tolerated. Induced antibody and E1/E2-specific T-cell responses in all patients independent of vaccine dose	[76]
GI5005: recombinant yeast transfected with HCV NS3–core fusion protein (Globeimmune)	II (2009)	66 patients with chronic HCV-G1 (treatment-naive and nonresponders)	17% SVR with vaccine + standard care, compared with standard therapy response of 5% in prior nonresponders	[80]
HCV core protein/ISCOMATRIX® (CSL Ltd)	I/IIa (2009)	30 healthy volunteers	Well tolerated, mild local redness; all developed antibody response	[82]

Recombinant protein hepatitis C vaccine advantages: well tolerated with low toxicity; induces cross-neutralizing antibodies; proof-of-concept (HBV vaccine).
Disadvantages: generally only weak T-cell responses elicited.
ALT: Alanine transaminase; HCV: Hepatitis C virus; SVR: Sustained virological response.

Table 2. Peptide hepatitis C vaccine studies.
Structure (Investigator)	Phase (year)	Subjects	Outcome	Ref.
IC41: five peptides from core, NS3 and NS4 + poly-l-arginine adjuvant (Intercell AG)	II (2008)	60 chronic HLA A2 HCV-infected nonresponders	Well tolerated. 67% T-cell response. Transient serum HCV RNA decline (>1 log) in three patients	[84]
Peptide derived from core protein (C35–44) (Karume University)	I (2009)	26 patients with chronic HCV (23 nonresponders, three untreated)	Well tolerated. 15 out of 25 responded, two out of 25 had a 1 log decline in HCV RNA	[90]
Personalized peptide approach CD8+ A24 peptides + Freund's adjuvant (Karume University)	I (2007)	12 chronic HCV-1b-infected nonresponders	Well tolerated. Majority developed peptide-specific T-cell responses. Five patients reduced ALT and three patients had a HCV RNA decline	[91]
Autologous dendritic cell delivered HLA A2 epitopes (Burnet Institute + others)	I (2010)	Six chronic HCV-infected nonresponders	Well tolerated. Transient T-cell responses	[92]
NS3/Virosome (Pevion Biotech)	N/A	30 healthy volunteers	Results pending

Peptide hepatitis C vaccine advantages: well tolerated with low toxicity; induces both cellular and humoral responses.
Disadvantages: limited immunogenicity (few epitopes only); need to tailor to patient HLA type; concern regarding appropriate peptide choice (e.g., induce Tregs rather than CD8⁺ cells).
ALT: Alanine transaminase; HCV: Hepatitis C virus; N/A: Not available.

Table 3. DNA hepatitis C vaccine studies†.
Structure/vector (Investigator)	Phase (year)	Subjects	Outcome	Ref.
CICGB-230: plasmid core/E1/E2 + recombinant core protein (University of Montreal + others)	I (2009)	15 genotype-1- infected nonresponders	Well tolerated, no viral clearance, 11 out of 15 – weak specific T-cell responses (ELISpot and proliferation). Six out of 15 – weak humoral response	[106]
ChonVac-C: plasmid NS3/4a + electroporation (Tripep)	I/IIa (2009)	12 HCV-1-infected, treatment-naive patients	Well tolerated. A total of four out of six who received higher doses: viral load reduction >0.5 log with corresponding T-cell response in three patients	[105]

†Ideal genes should represent part of the genome with limited genetic variability and maximal immunogenicity.
DNA hepatitis C vaccine advantages: presents a broad range of epitopes.
Disadvantage: electroporation is painful.
ELISpot: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot; HCV: Hepatitis C virus.

Table 4. Viral-vectored hepatitis C vaccine studies.
Structure/vector (Investigator)	Phase (year)	Subjects	Outcome	Ref.
TG4040: MVA vector expressing NS3/4/5B proteins (Transgene)	I (2009)	15 chronically infected HCV patients	A total of six out of 15 declined HCV viral load (0.5– 1.4 log) associated with T-cell response (IFN-g ELISpot)	[107]
Adenovirus vector (Ad6 and AdCh3) expressing NS3–5B proteins (Okairos and Oxford University).	I (2009)	36 healthy volunteers	Highly immunogenic and well tolerated	[73]

Viral-vectored hepatitis C vaccine advantages: efficient induction of cellular immune responses; presentation of a broader range of viral epitopes.
Disadvantages: pre-existing immunity to viral vector (adenovirus; may be overcome by the use of rare serotypes); limited experience in humans.
Ad: Adenovirus; ELISpot: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot; HCV: Hepatitis C virus; MVA: Modified vaccinia Ankara.

Comments

Commenting is limited to medical professionals. To comment please Log-in.

Comments on Medscape are moderated and should be professional in tone and on topic. You must declare any conflicts of interest related to your comments and responses. Please see our Commenting Guide for further information. We reserve the right to remove posts at our sole discretion.