Penile Shock Wave Therapy Helps Men With Severe Erectile Dysfunction

Jill Stein

March 22, 2011

March 22, 2011 (Vienna, Austria) — Low-intensity shock wave therapy to the penis can help men with severe erectile dysfunction (ED) that is unresponsive to conventional phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitor treatment, according to data released here at the European Association of Urology 26th Annual Congress.

"Our earlier randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study demonstrated that low-intensity shock wave therapy can help men who respond to PDE-5 inhibitor therapy, and our new data show that the treatment is also beneficial when given to nonresponders with severe ED," Yoram Vardi, MD, head of the neuro-urology unit at Rambam Medical Center in Haifa, Israel, told Medscape Medical News.

Dr. Yoram Vardi

The new findings confirm that the treatment exerts a genuine physiological effect on the erectile mechanism when applied directly to the cavernosal tissue, he added.

Dr. Vardi reported results in 29 men with vasculogenic ED who had a mean baseline International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-ED) domain score of 8.8 and a rigidity score of 2 or lower. Their mean age was 62.8 years.

"While the introduction of PDE-5 inhibitors undeniably represents a major advance in ED treatment, these agents are a symptomatic treatment and are associated with unpleasant side effects and poor compliance," Dr. Vardi said. "These limitations become magnified when the treatment is intended for a pleasurable biological function rather than a life-threatening disease."

Rationale for Shock Wave Therapy in ED

Low-energy shock wave therapy is being increasingly used to induce the regeneration of small coronary vessels in patients with angina who are not suitable for coronary surgery or angioplasty, Dr. Vardi explained.

If the therapy can improve the vasculature of the heart, it might also be effective in the penis, because 80% of ED cases have a vascular origin, he said.

The shock wave therapy protocol involved 2 treatment sessions per week for 3 weeks, which were then repeated 3 weeks later.

During each treatment session, low-energy shock wave therapy was applied to the penile shaft and crus for 3 minutes in 5 different penile anatomical sites. The shock waves are one tenth the level of intensity as shock waves used to pulverize kidney stones.

Patients had a follow-up assessment at 1 month, when they were not receiving a PDE-5 inhibitor, and again at 2 months, when they were receiving active on-demand PDE-5 inhibitor therapy.

The coprimary end points were changes on the IIEF-ED domain score and penile rigidity score.

Significant Improvement

At the end of the study, 21 patients (72.4%; P < .0001) achieved a rigidity score of 3 or higher, meaning they were able to achieve full vaginal penetration.

The mean IIEF-ED domain score of the participants increased to 18.8 ± 1.1 (P < .0001). For 22 patients (75.9%), the IIEF-ED domain scores were increased by 5 or more points, and the average improvement for all 30 patients exceeded 10 points. The erectile function of 8 patients had normalized at the second follow-up visit, and patients were able to function sexually without the use of medication.

In addition, all 3 hemodynamic penile parameters (maximum flow-mediated dilation [FMD]) and area under the curve FMD significantly increased (= .0001) and were significantly associated with an increase in IIEF-ED domain scores (P < .05).

There were no complaints of pain related to treatment, and no adverse events were reported during follow-up.

"The findings mean that low-intensity shock wave therapy was able to convert most nonresponders into PDE-5 inhibitor responders, thereby enabling men who were not functioning sexually to now achieve vaginal penetration and full intercourse," Dr. Vardi observed.

Importantly, the 21 diabetic patients in this series had significant improvement in ED. "These men are normally very difficult to treat," he said.

Elsewhere at the meeting, Dr. Vardi reported that the results from the first randomized sham-controlled study demonstrated that the application of the device directly to the penis has a significant effect on erectile mechanism and hemodynamics, compared with the sham intervention.

Dr. James Catto

"The biggest problem with ED treatments is that the tablets are used on an on-demand basis and don't work for a proportion of patients; that proportion may be 30% or 70%, depending on the population and the prescribing physician," James Catto, MB ChB, PhD, FRCP, from the academic urology unit and Institute for Cancer Studies at the University of Sheffield, United Kingdom, told Medscape Medical News. "If tablets don't work, we consider options like injections and pumps, which are much less palatable for the patient and his partner."

The potential appeal of shock wave therapy is that, unlike current ED treatments, which are symptomatic and used on an on-demand basis, shock wave therapy aims to provide sustained improvement of the erectile mechanism and cure ED, he said. "Shock wave therapy potentially allows a man to return to a more normal environment, where he doesn't have to use medication. If he does still use medication, he will likely get a better result from it."

The study was partially supported by an unrestricted grant from Medispec, the company that manufactures the ED1000 device that was used in the study. Dr. Vardi and Dr. Catto have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

European Association of Urology (EAU) 26th Annual Congress: Abstract 1074. Presented March 21, 2011.


Comments on Medscape are moderated and should be professional in tone and on topic. You must declare any conflicts of interest related to your comments and responses. Please see our Commenting Guide for further information. We reserve the right to remove posts at our sole discretion.