Study Design, Duration |
No. of Patients (mean age) |
Treatment Regimen |
Primary End Points |
Secondary End Points |
Double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, 12 wks[35,36] |
Primary analysis: 196 (56.5 yrs in active group, 57.4 yrs in placebo group) |
Epalrestat 50 mg t.i.d. or placebo (epalrestat 3 mg t.i.d.) |
Compared with baselinea: MNCV (peroneal nerve): ↑1.6 m/sec (p<0.01) MNCV (median nerve): ↑ 4.4 m/sec (p<0.001) SNCV (median nerve): ↑ 3.3 m/sec (p<0.05) Active vs placebo: TVS 13.8 vs 1.7 μm (p<0.01) |
Subjective symptoms (active vs placebo): Disappearance rate in upper limbs: 42.9% vs 12.0% (p<0.1) Disappearance rate in lower limbs: 48.6% vs 22.6% (p<0.05) Improvement rate of subjective symptoms: 47% vs 27% (p<0.01) Improvement rate of nerve function tests (active vs placebo): 33% vs 24% (p<0.01) |
Secondary analysis: 162 (stratified by A1C value) |
Active vs placebo: MNCV (peroneal nerve): A1C ≥ 7.5%: 2.25 vs 1 m/sec (p<0.05) A1C ≤ 7.4%: 1 vs 1.5 m/sec (p=NS) MNCV (median nerve): A1C ≥ 7.5%: 4.5 vs 2.25 m/sec (p<0.001) A1C ≤ 7.4%: 3.5 vs 2 m/sec (p<0.01) SNCV (median nerve): A1C ≥ 7.5%: 5.5 vs 3 m/sec (p<0.05) A1C ≤ 7.4%: 1 vs 4.5 m/sec (p=NS) |
Active vs placebo: Improvement rates of subjective symptoms: A1C ≥ 7.5%: 49% vs 27% (p<0.1) A1C ≤ 7.4%: 49% vs 28% (p<0.1) Improvement rates of nerve function tests: A1C ≥ 7.5%: 46% vs 23% (p<0.05) A1C ≤ 7.4%: 19% vs 26% (p=NS) Changes in fasting blood glucose and A1C levels (p=NS) |
Open-label, 24 wks[37] |
45 (58.9 yrs) |
Epalrestat 50 mg t.i.d. |
Improvement in spontaneous pain in lower limbs: > 60% in wks 12-24 (p<0.001) VPT (tuning fork): 8.5 vs 7.0 sec after 24 wks (p<0.001) VPT (vibrometer): 22.6 vs 24.4 x 10-2 G after 24 wks (p<0.01) |
Compared with baseline: Changes in body mass index, A1C values, fructosamine levels, lipid panel, and apoprotein level (p=NS for all) |
Double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, 12-24 wks[38] |
5249 (62 yrs) |
Epalrestat 50 mg t.i.d. before meals |
Compared with baseline: Improvement in spontaneous pain in upper and lower limbs: fewer cases at 3 and 6 mo (p<0.001) Improvement in sensory disorders: fewer cases of numbness, coldness, and hypoesthesia at 3 and 6 mo (p<0.001) MNCV (peroneal nerve): ↑ ∼1 m/sec at 3 mo (p<0.05) SNCV (sural nerve): ↑ ∼0.5 m/sec at 3 mo (p<0.05) Vibration sensitivity: ↑ ∼1 sec (p<0.001) |
Physician observed efficacy: improvement rates of subjective symptoms and nerve function: 75% and 36%, respectively (p=NS) |
Randomized, open-label, 24 wks[39] |
28 (60.9 yrs in active group, 62.2 yrs in placebo group) |
Epalrestat 150 mg q.d. or placebo |
Autonomic functiona |
Compared with baseline: Somatic nerve function: Minimum latency of the F wave (median nerve): ↓ 2.7 msec (p=0.020) Minimum latency of the F wave (tibial nerve): ↓ 2.7 msec (p=0.011) Changes in MNCV, SNCV, VPT (p=NS) Change in A1C values (p=NS) |
Open-label, 24 wks[40] |
30 (34-77 yrs) |
Epalrestat 150 mg q.d. |
All values at 1 and 6 mo vs baseline: Median nerve: Distal latency: ↓ 0.1 and 0.2 msec (p<0.001 and p<0.05) CMAP: ↑ 1.1 for both mo (p<0.05) MNCV: ↑ 0.1 and 0.6 m/sec (p=NS) F wave latency:↓ 0.4 and 1 msec (p<0.05) SNCV: ↑ 1.5 and 1.7 m/sec (p<0.05) SNAPs: ↑ 0.7 and 1.2 uV (p=NS) Tibial nerve: Distal latency: ↓ 0.1 and ↑0.3 msec (p=NS) CMAP: ↓ 0.3 and ↑ 0.1 (p=NS) MNCV: ↑ 0.5 and 0.4 (p=NS) F wave latency: ↓ 1.0 and 1.1 (p<0.001 and p<0.05) Sural nerve: SNCV: ↓ 0.5 and 1.2 m/sec (p=NS) SNAPs: ↑ 0.6 and 1 uV (p<0.05 at 6 mo only) |
All values at 1 mo vs baseline: Strength-duration time constant: ↑ 0.46 msec (p=0.06) Threshold change: ↑ 2.0% (p<0.05) |
Randomized, open-label, 3 yrs[41,42] |
594 (61.5 yrs) |
Epalrestat 50 mg t.i.d. |
Values at 1, 2, and 3 yrs vs baseline: MNCV (median nerve): ↑ 0.29, ↑ 0.28, and ↑ 0.11 m/sec (p=NS) Active vs control group: MNCV (median nerve): 52.57 vs. 51.42 m/sec (p=0.001) |
Active vs control group: Minimum F wave latency: 26.59 vs 27.15 msec (p<0.001) VPT: 8.86 vs 7.83 sec (p=0.041) |