The Adult Film Industry: Time to Regulate?

Corita R. Grudzen; Peter R. Kerndt

Disclosures

PLoS Med. 2007;4(6):e126 

In This Article

Introduction

The United States adult film industry produces 4,000-11,000 films and earns an estimated $9-$13 billion in gross revenues annually.[1] An estimated 200 production companies employ 1,200-1,500 performers.[2] Performers typically earn $400-$1,000 per shoot and are not compensated based on distribution or sales.

Los Angeles County is the largest center for adult film production worldwide. In 1988 the California Supreme Court, in People v. Freeman, found adult film production to be protected as free speech under the First Amendment, since such films were not considered obscene based on prevailing community standards. Unlike other legal but highly regulated activities such as gambling and commercial sex work in Nevada, the adult film industry was legalized in California through case law, not by statute, and has for the most part escaped governmental oversight. Regulation of the industry has been limited to prevention of child pornography. Title 18, Section 2257 of the United States Code of Regulations explicitly prohibits performers under age 18 and provides for civil and criminal prosecutions for any violation.[3] Adult film production companies are required to have a Custodian of Records to document and retain records of the age of all performers, to enforce the age entry restriction.

Adult film performers engage in prolonged and repeated sexual acts with multiple sexual partners over short periods of time, creating ideal conditions for transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). All the more concerning, high-risk practices are on the rise.[4] These practices include sex acts that involve simultaneous double penetration (double-anal and vaginal-anal intercourse) and repeated facial ejaculations. At the same time, condom use is reportedly low in heterosexual adult films--approximately 17% for adult performers.[5] In 2004, only two of the 200 adult film companies required the use of condoms for all penile-anal and penile-vaginal penetration.[2] Performers report that they are required to work without condoms to maintain employment.

These practices lead to high transmission rates of STDs and occasionally HIV among performers. After four performers contracted HIV in 1998, Sharon Mitchell, a former adult film performer, founded Adult Industry Medical (http://www.aim-med.org), a clinic to counsel and screen performers monthly for HIV using a PCR test (Figure 1). It was expanded later to include other STD testing. The testing program began as an effort to reduce transmission of infections through early diagnosis, treatment, and "quarantine" should a performer test positive for HIV. Performers are required in most cases to pay for all screening tests, and to sign a consent form that permits disclosure of their test results to other performers and producers before filming. Both of these practices are explicitly prohibited under California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal/OSHA) regulations. HIV-positive female performers are permanently excluded from participating in adult films.

Figure 1.

Screenshot of the Web site of Adult Industry Medical Health Care Foundation

Comments

3090D553-9492-4563-8681-AD288FA52ACE
Comments on Medscape are moderated and should be professional in tone and on topic. You must declare any conflicts of interest related to your comments and responses. Please see our Commenting Guide for further information. We reserve the right to remove posts at our sole discretion.
Post as:

processing....