Minimizing Genital Tract Trauma and Related Pain Following Spontaneous Vaginal Birth

Leah L. Albers, CNM, DrPH; Noelle Borders, CNM, MSN

Disclosures

J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007;52(3):246-253. 

In This Article

Second Stage Pushing: Coached Versus Spontaneous

Most of the research on pushing method has compared directed, coached, or Valsalva pushing (forceful bearing down, closed glottis, and sustained breath holding) with spontaneous or self-paced pushing (non-directed, multiple short pushes, with no sustained breath holding). Studies comparing these two techniques have been primarily concerned with the effect of pushing style on neonatal acid-base status and/or the length of second stage.[15] Some studies have directly addressed the relationship between pushing method and perineal or pelvic floor injury, or have included it in their analyses.[16,17]

Sampselle and Hines[16] reported survey data from 39 first-time mothers who gave birth within the previous year. Eleven women recalled pushing spontaneously and 28 recalled using Valsalva pushing. An intact perineum resulted in 5 of the 11 women who pushed spontaneously and 2 of the 28 women who pushed forcefully (P < .05). Simpson and James[17] randomized 45 nulliparas with epidurals to either coached pushing at complete cervical dilatation, or to a 2-hour rest period at the beginning of second stage, followed by non-Valsalva pushing. Immediate pushing was associated with lower fetal oxygen saturation and 13 of 22 women in this group had perineal lacerations compared with 5 of 23 in the delayed pushing group (P = .01).

Schaffer et al.[18] randomized 128 nulliparas to either coached (Valsalva) or non-coached pushing for second-stage labor to assess the effect on pelvic floor function at 3 months after birth. Only two women per group used epidural analgesia. Three months after birth, all women had pelvic floor and urodynamic studies, including vaginal squeeze tests and coughing against a full bladder. Women who had used Valsalva pushing had less favorable urodynamic indices, indicating potential pelvic floor dysfunction from forceful pushing to effect delivery.

Finally, a secondary analysis from the perineal management trial by Albers et al.[19] assessed risk factors for sutured genital tract trauma in first-time versus other mothers. All women (N = 1176) had spontaneous vaginal births without an episiotomy. Women with sutured obstetric lacerations were more likely to have used Valsalva pushing than women without lacerations (37% vs. 24% of first-time mothers and 26% vs. 15% of other mothers). In first births, where mothers tend to push longer, regression analysis showed that Valsalva pushing in second stage was an independent predictor of childbirth lacerations (RR = 1.65; 95% CI, 1.05-2.59).

These studies indicate that the only apparent advantage of Valsalva pushing is a shorter second stage, which, on occasion, may be desirable. However, expediting delivery by forceful, directed pushing is achieved at the expense of three negative outcomes: reduced oxygenation of the fetus, more frequent trauma to the birth canal, and potential injury to future pelvic floor function.

Comments

3090D553-9492-4563-8681-AD288FA52ACE
Comments on Medscape are moderated and should be professional in tone and on topic. You must declare any conflicts of interest related to your comments and responses. Please see our Commenting Guide for further information. We reserve the right to remove posts at our sole discretion.
Post as:

processing....