Voice Recognition and Medical Transcription

Bryan Bergeron, MD

In This Article

The Players

If you're in a larger medical institution, you may be using a server-side transcription service and not even know it. However, if you have a small practice and report turn-around time is an issue, there are several options for dedicated PC systems. The 3 major players in the industry are Dragon Systems, IBM, and Philips.

I've used Dragon and IBM extensively, and find them to be different but equivalent. IBM is a little easier to use and seems faster, but Dragon has slightly better recognition accuracy. Also, Dragon's medical solution seems better integrated than IBM's, which is limited to an add-on medical vocabulary option. An advantage of the IBM solution is that it's available on the Macintosh. (Of note, Dragon was the only third-party voice-recognition solution available on the early Macs).


Comments on Medscape are moderated and should be professional in tone and on topic. You must declare any conflicts of interest related to your comments and responses. Please see our Commenting Guide for further information. We reserve the right to remove posts at our sole discretion.
Post as: