Vasa Previa Diagnosis and Management

Andre F. Lijoi, MD; Joanna Brady, MD

Disclosures

J Am Board Fam Med. 2003;16(6) 

In This Article

Results

Vasa previa is a rare obstetrical catastrophe with a reported incidence ranging from 1 in 1275 to 1 in 8333.[1,2] The diagnosis is often not made antepartum. Patients usually present with bleeding at the time of spontaneous or artificial rupture of membranes.[2] However, bleeding can occur before rupture of membranes.[7] Vasa previa can also present with fetal bradycardia when the velamentous vessels are compressed by the presenting part.[8,9] Antoine et al10 described a twin pregnancy complicated by vasa previa that presented with a sinusoidal fetal heart rate pattern before the development of bleeding. Occasionally, fetal vessels are palpated at the time of digital examination, and compression of the vessel may cause deceleration of the fetal heart rate.[11] Fetal death caused by asphyxia and hemorrhagic shock has been described.[12,13]

The reported incidence of bilobed placenta varies widely in the literature, ranging from 0.04% to 4.2%.[6,5] In the Collaborative Perinatal Study, Naeyeexamined more than 46,000 placentas and found 1.7% to be bilobed. In two thirds of cases, a velamentous cord insertion was identified (Fig. 2). The cord inserts on the larger placental disk in a third of cases.[5] The risk of retained placenta is increased.[6]

Figure 2.

Placenta demonstrating bilobed structure, marginal insertion of umbilical cord, and partial velamentous insertions of cord (fetal vessels traversing membranes to reach smaller placental lobe on right). (Reprinted from Cunningham FG, et al. editors. Williams obstetrics. 21st ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001. p. 828. Copyright © 2001 McGraw-Hill Companies. Reproduced with permission.)

An amnioscope is a simple tube endoscope that is used for the direct visualization of the amniotic membranes. In their study evaluating postdatism, Browne and Brennan[15] identified 2 cases of vasa previa using amnioscopy. Barham[16] reported in 1973 the diagnosis of vasa previa via amnioscopy before amniotomy.

The Kleihauer Betke, Ogita, and Apt tests and hemoglobin electrophoresis can be used to detect the presence of fetal hemoglobin when patients present with vaginal bleeding; however, time often does not allow for this to be completed in an emergent situation.[3,4,17,18] Magnetic resonance imaging has been used to diagnose vasa previa but is often impractical for diagnosis, especially in the emergent setting.[19]

Many authors have tried to elucidate the role of ultrasound in diagnosing vasa previa. Gianopoulos and colleagues[20] were the first to describe the diagnosis of vasa previa using ultrasound in a woman with a history of a low-lying placenta and a succenturiate lobe. Nelson and colleagues[21] were the first to report the use of color flow Doppler to diagnose vasa previa in a woman at 26 weeks' gestation. Clerici and colleagues[22] also reported the use of color flow Doppler to confirm the presence of vasa previa in a patient that presented with a suspected amniotic band identified by routine ultrasound.

Daly-Jones and colleagues[23] reported a 34-year-old woman in her second trimester with findings of a low-lying bilobed placenta on ultrasound. Color flow Doppler confirmed the presence of vasa previa. They recommended that women with a low-lying placenta be screened for vasa previa with color flow Doppler.

Between January 1991 and December 1998, Lee et al[24] retrospectively reviewed ultrasounds of 93,874 women who had been scanned in their medical center. Eighteen cases of vasa previa were identified. One case associated with velamentous cord insertion was not diagnosed before labor. The earliest diagnosis was made at 15.6 weeks. Three patients had bilobed placentas and 2 had succenturiate lobes. Eight had a placental edge overlying the cervical os. Three of the 18 patients had regression of the vasa previa noted on late third trimester scanning and had uneventful vaginal deliveries. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for diagnosing vasa previa could not be assessed.

Fung and Lau[1] reported 3 patients with vasa previa and reviewed 48 cases reported between 1980 and 1997. Thirty-one patients with vasa previa were diagnosed during or after delivery. Of these patients, 20 developed intrapartum bleeding. Eight of the 20 delivered infants with a 5-minute Apgar score of less than 7. Twelve of the 20 were anemic or required a transfusion, and 2 of 20 died. The fetal mortality in this group was 22.5%.

In 22 patients, vasa previa was diagnosed antenatally. There were no deaths in this group. Of these patients, 16 did not bleed, and none had any of the above complications. Six of the 22 did bleed before delivery, and resulted in 1 infant with an Apgar score less than 7 and anemia. Therefore, their analysis revealed that the fetal loss rate (P = .033), the incidence of 5-minute Apgar scores <7 (P = .033), and the incidence of fetal anemia or neonatal blood transfusion (P = .002) were significantly less if the diagnosis was made antenatally.

Catanzarite and colleagues[25] reported a specificity of 91% for the sonographic diagnosis of vasa previa. They could not ascertain the sensitivity of ultrasonographic diagnosis of vasa previa because they did not have outcomes data for all pregnancies they scanned.

The authors suggested that screening "transvaginal ultrasound be performed in the late first or early second trimesters with targeted sonography in patients with 'resolving' placenta previa or low-lying bilobed placenta." They recognized that all cases of vasa previa will probably not be identified by this liberal approach. Maternal size, the status of the maternal bladder, and the orientation of vessels as they cross the lower uterine segment may limit visualization of the offending fetal vessels.[24,25] The differential diagnosis of vasa previa on ultrasound includes chorioamniotic membrane separation, a normal cord loop, a marginal placental vascular sinus, and an amniotic band, all of which can give an appearance similar to vasa previa ( Table 1 ).[24] Color flow Doppler helps differentiate these conditions.

Oyelese and colleagues[26] commented that the true incidence of vasa previa is unknown and may be under-reported. Oyelese and colleagues recommended that consideration should be given to screening patients in high-risk groups for vasa previa with transvaginal ultrasound and possibly amnioscopy before rupture of membranes. These patients included those with bilobed and succenturiate placentas, multiple pregnancies, pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization, those with low insertion of the cord, and those in which a palpable vessel or a suspected amniotic band is felt on vaginal examination.[2] Daly-Jones and colleagues[23] recommended that patients with a low-lying placenta also be screened ( Table 2 ).

Oyelese[27] also recommended a routine obstetric ultrasound at 20 weeks' gestation and stressed that placental location and cord insertion should be ascertained, given the association of a velamentous or marginal insertion of the cord and vasa previa. Nomiyama et al[28] reported that the placental cord insertion could be identified in 99.8% of 587 patients scanned between 18 and 20 weeks. The sensitivity for identifying velamentous insertion was 100%, the specificity was 99.8%, the positive predictive value was 83%, and the negative predictive value was 100%. Two cases of vasa previa were identified, but only 1 persisted to term. These results contrast with those reported by Pretorius et al,[29] who were able to identify placental cord insertion in only 67% of women scanned between 15 and 20 weeks.

Comments

3090D553-9492-4563-8681-AD288FA52ACE

processing....