Introduction
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) was passed into Federal law in 1996, with the deadline for meeting its extensive requirements of privacy regulations effective April 14, 2003.[1] Although the concept that a patient's medical information should remain private has been accepted for many years, the new regulations have introduced a previously unseen level of specificity and complexity to the process of transmitting information between caregivers and healthcare institutions.
It is worth recalling that the driving force behind these regulations was the arrival of the electronic era of archiving and transmitting almost every facet of patient information, and with it, the need to establish stronger protections for the privacy of that information. Recognizing the slow progress that the healthcare industry has made toward the goal of converting all patient records into electronic information, however, the privacy rule applies equally to patients' paper records.
Few would argue against the positive patient-oriented intent of the legislation. What lawmakers and regulators did not anticipate was the mass confusion that has resulted in hospitals and doctor's offices around the country stemming from an incomplete or inaccurate interpretation of the law. Five months after the privacy rule's enactment, major institutions, such as Tufts-New England Medical Center, (where I am Chairman of the Department of Medicine), have experienced interruptions in urgent patient care because of mistakes in how the privacy rules are interpreted.
Medscape Business of Medicine. 2003;4(2) © 2003
Medscape
Cite this: HIPAA's Privacy Regulations: Increased Privacy Comes at a Cost - Medscape - Sep 25, 2003.
Comments