Cancer Clusters: Findings Vs Feelings

David Robinson

In This Article

A Checklist: ACSH Recommends

For healthcare providers:

  • Encourage your patients to be skeptical. "Common sense" does not trump science in this realm.

  • Encourage your patients to know their sources: activists and experts often disagree when it comes to cancer clusters.

  • Encourage your patients to remember the bull's-eye effect: check for bias in the way statistics are organized or calculated.

For journalists:

  • Help consumers differentiate among suspected clusters in which incidence is actually not increased, clusters in which incidence is increased, and clusters for which a cause other than chance has been identified or is at least strongly suspected on good scientific grounds.

  • Put community concern in context -- use information like that contained in this report to ensure that the science of cancer clusters gets covered along with the human side of the issue.

  • Clearly distinguish between helpful actions that people can take to reduce cancer risk -- frequent checks for early detection, a healthy diet and exercise, and in some cases chemoprevention -- from steps like filtering the water that are not proven ways of reducing cancer risk.

For politicians:

  • Focus on measures that are both popular and proven -- like mammograms and chemoprevention when appropriate for breast cancer, and frank but well-informed discussion of confirmed lifestyle risks for all cancers.

  • Explain the facts about environmental clusters -- we may have nothing to fear but fear itself.

  • Maximize the efficacy of cancer research and epidemiology dollars by allowing public health officials and scientists to direct and manage the details of research efforts.


Comments on Medscape are moderated and should be professional in tone and on topic. You must declare any conflicts of interest related to your comments and responses. Please see our Commenting Guide for further information. We reserve the right to remove posts at our sole discretion.