Current Status of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection and Testicular Cancer: When to Operate

Richard Foster, MD; Richard Bihrle, MD

Disclosures

Cancer Control. 2002;9(4) 

In This Article

Conclusions

In low-stage disease, the surgical removal of involved retroperitoneal lymph nodes has a solid rationale. The morbidity of nerve-sparing RPLND is low, and many patients who undergo removal of retroperitoneal metastatic disease are cured with surgical therapy alone, thereby avoiding chemotherapy. In postchemotherapy disease, the rationale for removing these retroperitoneal masses is strong. Approximately 60% to 70% of the time, the mass will be composed of either teratoma or persistent cancer, and surgical removal may be therapeutic. In more complicated postchemotherapy disease such as late relapse or the removal of chemoresistant retroperitoneal cancer (desperation RPLND), 30% to 40% of these patients with chemo-resistant metastatic cancer can be cured with surgical therapy alone. These postchemotherapy procedures, however, can be technically challenging and require specialized vascular capabilities. Similarly, the appearance of the tumor on CT scans may not be a valid indication of the technical requirements for surgical removal. These difficult surgical procedures require diverse technical capabilities and a commitment to a sometimes lengthy and arduous procedure.

CME Information

This article was originally certified for CME credit. For accreditation details, contact the publisher.
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612. Telephone: (813) 632-1349. Fax: (813) 903-4950. Email: ccjournal@moffitt.usf.edu. Cancer Control is included in Index Medicus/MEDLINE and EMBASE/Excerpta Medica.)

Disclosure Policy

As a sponsor accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education, the University of South Florida College of Medicine must insure balance, independence, objectivity and scientific rigor in all its individually sponsored or jointly sponsored educational activities. Faculty participating in a sponsored activity are expected to disclose to the activity audience any significant financial interest or other relationship (1) with the manufacturer(s) of any commercial product(s) and (2) with any commercial supporters of the activity. (Significant financial interest or other relationship can include such things as grants or research support, employee, consultant, major stock holder, member of speaker's bureau, etc.). The intent of this disclosure is not to prevent a speaker with a significant financial or other relationship from making a presentation, but rather to provide listeners with information on which they can make their own judgments. It remains for the audience to determine whether the speaker's interests or relationships may influence the presentation with regard to exposition or conclusion.

Comments

3090D553-9492-4563-8681-AD288FA52ACE
Comments on Medscape are moderated and should be professional in tone and on topic. You must declare any conflicts of interest related to your comments and responses. Please see our Commenting Guide for further information. We reserve the right to remove posts at our sole discretion.

processing....