Abstract and Introduction
Abstract
Background Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1) produce unique toxicity profiles. The objective of this review was to identify patterns and incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAE) based on tumour type and ICI class.
Methods Medline, EMBASE and COCHRANE databases were searched to identify prospective monotherapy trials of ICIs from 2003 to November 2015. Paired reviewers selected studies for inclusion and extracted data. Odds ratio (OR), χ 2 tests and multivariable regression models were used to analyse for effect size and associations.
Results We identified 48 trials (6938 patients), including 26 CTLA-4, 17 PD-1, 2 PD-L1 trials, and 3 studies tested both CTLA-4 and PD-1. Grade 3/4 irAE were more common with CTLA-4 mAbs compared with PD-1 (31% versus 10%). All grades colitis (OR 8.7, 95% CI 5.8–12.9), hypophysitis (OR 6.5, 95% CI 3.0–14.3) and rash (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.8–2.3) were more frequent with CTLA-4 mAbs; whereas pneumonitis (OR 6.4, 95% CI 3.2–12.7), hypothyroidism (OR 4.3, 95% CI 2.9–6.3), arthralgia (OR 3.5, 95% CI 2.6–4.8) and vitiligo (OR 3.5, 95% CI 2.3–5.3) were more common with PD-1 mAbs. Comparison of irAE from the three most studied tumour types in PD-1 mAbs trials [melanoma (n = 2048), non-small-cell lung cancer (n = 1030) and renal cell carcinoma (n = 573)] showed melanoma patients had a higher frequency of gastrointestinal and skin irAE and lower frequency of pneumonitis.
Discussion CTLA-4 and PD-1 mAbs have distinct irAE profiles. Different immune microenvironments may drive histology-specific irAE patterns. Other tumour-dependent irAE profiles may be identified as data emerge from ICI trials.
Introduction
Immune surveillance involves detection and elimination of cancer cells by the immune system.[1] A hallmark of cancer is a failure of surveillance that leads to tolerance, equilibrium and escape with the establishment of malignant disease. Examples of mechanisms of adaptive immune resistance include downregulation of major histocompatibility complex antigen expression, secretion of immunosuppressive cytokines and negative regulation of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells via checkpoint inhibition.[2]
Impressive single agent activity of various immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has resulted in regulatory approval of several agents in a variety of solid tumour indications.[3–9] To enhance antitumour immune responses, combination strategies that include ICI with chemotherapy, targeted molecules and other immune-based therapies are being explored. Successful combination strategies will depend not only on antitumour immune response and survival outcomes, but also on the toxicity profile and tolerability.
Immune-related adverse events (irAE) from ICI, differ from toxicities caused by cytotoxic or molecularly targeted agents. The time to toxicity may be delayed and not follow a cyclical pattern as seen with conventional cytotoxics. Mechanisms of toxicity remain to be defined and may well be heterogeneous between patients even with the same agent. The over-reactive immune response may be driven by the removal of tolerance by ICI unmasking low-level self-reactive T cells, macrophage-mediated toxicity or production of antibodies from activated B cells.[2] These irAE are wide ranging in terms of organs affected and severity. Dermatologic, endocrine, neurologic, gastrointestinal, respiratory and musculoskeletal toxicities may occur alone or in constellation. The majority are self-limiting or resolve with immunosuppressants such as corticosteroids. Persistent irAE that do not resolve with corticosteroids require tumour necrosis factor α receptor antagonists such as infliximab, in the case of colitis or mycophenolate in the case of refractory hepatitis, an inhibitor of purine synthesis in T and B cells. Only a small minority of irAE do not respond to these immune modulators.[10]
We hypothesize that the patterns, range and severity of irAE may differ between different ICI classes. A better understanding of irAE would enable better patient management of irAE. It would also inform the design of future ICI trials particularly where combinations of agents are being explored and where tolerability is key to their success. We conducted a systematic review of prospective monotherapy trials of ICI. The objective was to identify and contrast patterns and incidence of irAE based on ICI class and tumour type.
Ann Oncol. 2017;28(10):2377-2385. © 2017 Oxford University Press
Copyright European Society for Medical Oncology. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.