Medscape www.medscape.com

References for:
Controlled Drinking: More Than Just a Controversy

[Curr Opin Psychiatry 17(3):175-187, 2004. © 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]


Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

*of special interest
**of outstanding interest

  1. Jellinek EM. Phases of alcohol addiction. Q J Stud Alcohol 1952; 13:673-684.
  2. Jellinek EM. Phases in drinking history of alcoholics: Analysis of a survey conducted by the official organ of alcoholics anonymous. Q J Stud Alcohol 1946; 19:1-88.
  3. Jellinek EM. The disease concept of alcoholism. New Haven: Hillhouse Press; 1960.
  4. Miller N, Toft D. The disease concept of alcoholism and other addiction. Center City: Hazeldon Foundation; 1990.
  5. Nace EP. Alcoholic Anonymous. The treatment of alcoholism. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1987.
  6. Alcoholics Anonymous. New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services Inc.; 1976.
  7. Rosenberg H, Davis LA. Acceptance of moderate drinking by alcohol treatment services in the United States. J Stud Alcohol 1994; 57:167-172.
  8. Ambrogne JA. Reduced-risk drinking as a treatment goal: What clinicians need to know. J Subst Abuse Treat 2002; 22:45-53.
  9. Larimer ME, Marlatt GA, Baer JS, et al. Harm reduction for alcohol problems: Expanding access to and acceptability of prevention treatment services. In: Marlatt GA, editor. Harm reduction: Pragmatic strategies for managing high-risk behaviors. New York: Guilford Press; 1998. pp. 69-121.
  10. Roizen R. The great controlled-drinking controversy. In: Galanter M, editor. Recent developments in alcoholism. Volume 5. New York: Plenum; 1987. pp. 245-279.
  11. Peele S. Why do controlled-drinking outcomes vary by investigator, by country and by era? Cultural conceptions of relapse and remission in alcoholism. Drug Alcohol Depend 1987; 20:173-201.
  12. Davies DL. Normal drinking in recovered alcoholics. Q J Stud Alcohol 1962; 23:94-104.
  13. Edwards G. Paradigm shift or change in ownership? The conceptual significance of D. L. Davies' classic paper. Drug Alcohol Depend 1985; 15:19-35.
  14. Armor DJ, Polich JM, Stambul BH. Alcoholism and treatment. New York: Wiley; 1978.
  15. Polich JM, Armor DJ, Braiker HB. The course of alcoholism: Four years after treatment. New York: Wiley; 1981.
  16. Boffey P. Alcoholism study under new attack. New York Times, June 28;1982; Section A12 (col.).
  17. Boffey P. Showdown nears in feud over alcohol studies. New York Times, November 2; 1982; Section C1.
  18. Boffey P. Panel finds no fraud by alcohol researchers. New York Times, September 11; 1984; Section C8.
  19. Researcher repudiates study on alcoholic social drinking. New York Times San Diego, August 26; 1982; Section A20 (col.).
  20. Sobell MB, Sobell LC. Individualized behavior therapy for alcoholics: Rationale, procedures, preliminary results and appendix. Sacramento: Department of Mental Hygiene; 1972.
  21. Sobell MB, Sobell LC. Alcoholics treated by individualized behaviour therapy: One year treatment outcome. Behav Res Ther 1973; 11:599-618.
  22. Sobell MB, Sobell LC. Second year treatment outcome of alcoholics treated by individualized behavior therapy: Results. Behav Res Ther 1976; 14:195-215.
  23. Caddy GR, Addington HJ, Perkins D. Individualized behaviour therapy for alcoholics: A third year independent double-blind follow-up. Behav Res Ther 1978; 16:345-362.
  24. Pendery ML, Maltzman IM, West LJ. Controlled drinking by alcoholics? New findings and a reevaluation of a major affirmative study. Science 1982; 217:169-175.
  25. Sobell MB, Sobell LC. Controlled drinking after 25 years: How important was the great debate? [editorial]. Addiction 1995; 90:1149-1154.
  26. Hester RK. Behavioral self-control training. In: Hester RK, Miller WR, editors. Handbook of alcoholism treatment approaches: Effective alternatives. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon; 1995. pp. 148-159.
  27. Sanchez-Craig M, Annis HM, Bornet AR, MacDonald KR. Random assignment to abstinence and controlled drinking evaluation of a cognitive-behavioral program for problem drinkers. J Consult Clin Psychol 1984; 52:390-403.
  28. Werch CE. Perception of intoxication and blood alcohol concentration of drinkers in social settings. Int J Addict 1990; 25:253-262.
  29. Walters GD. Behavioral self-control training for problem drinkers: A meta-analysis of randomized control studies. Behav Ther 2000; 31:135-149.
  30. Miller WR, Brown JM, Simpson TL, et al. What works? A methodological analysis of the alcohol treatment outcome literature. In: Hester RK, Miller WR, editors. Handbook of alcoholism treatment approaches: Effective alternatives. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon; 1995. pp. 12-44.
  31. Hester RK, Delaney HD. Behavioral self-control program for windows: Results of a controlled clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol 1997; 65:686-693.
  32. Rubio G, Manzanares J, Lopez-Munoz F, et al. Naltrexone improves outcome of a controlled drinking program. J Subst Abuse Treat 2002; 23:361-366.
  33. O'Malley SS, Jaffe AJ, Chang G, et al. Naltrexone and coping skills therapy for alcohol dependence: A controlled study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992; 49:881-887.
  34. O'Malley SS, Jaffe AJ, Chang G, et al. Six-month follow-up of naltrexone and psychotherapy for alcohol dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996; 53:217-224.
  35. Chick J, Anton R, Checinski K, et al. A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of naltrexone in the treatment of alcohol dependence and abuse. Alcohol Alcohol 2000; 35:587-593.
  36. Anton RF, Moak DH, Waid LR, et al. Naltrexone and cognitive behavioral therapy for the treatment of outpatient alcoholics: Results of a placebo-controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156:1758-1764.
  37. Rubio G, Jimenez-Arriero MA, Ponce G, Palomo T. Naltrexone versus acamprosate: One year follow-up of alcohol dependence treatment. Alcohol Alcohol 2001; 36:419-425.
  38. Volpicelli JR, Rhines KC, Rhines JS, et al. Naltrexone and alcohol dependence: Role of subject compliance. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997; 54:737-742.
  39. Kranzler HR, Tennen HT, Penta CH, Bohn MJ. Targeted naltrexone treatment of early problem drinkers. Addict Behav 1997; 22:431-436.
  40. Bohn MJ, Kranzler HR, Beazoglou D, Staehler BA. Naltrexone and brief counseling to reduce heavy drinking. Am J Addict 1994; 2:91-99.
  41. Drobes DJ, Saladin ME, Tiffany ST. Classical conditioning mechanisms in alcohol dependence. In: Heather N, Peters TJ, Stockwell T, editors. International handbook of alcohol dependence and problems. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2001. pp. 281-297.
  42. Monti PM, Rohsenow DJ, Rubonis AV, et al. Cue exposure with coping skills treatment for male alcoholics: A preliminary investigation. J Consult Clin Psychol 1993; 61:1011-1019.
  43. Drummond DC, Glautier S. A controlled trial of cue exposure treatment in alcohol dependence. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994; 62:809-817.
  44. Sitharthan T, Sitharthan G, Hough MJ, Kavanagh DJ. Cue exposure in moderation drinking: A comparison with cognitive-behavior therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 1997; 65:878-882.
  45. Sitharthan T, Job RFS, Kavanagh DJ, et al. Development of a controlled drinking self-efficacy scale and appraising its relation to alcohol dependence. J Clin Psychol 2003; 59:351-362.
    ** These authors discuss the psychometric evaluation of a controlled-drinking self-efficacy scale, including factor structure. This may be a useful measure for indexing change in controlled-drinking self-efficacy during the course of treatment; controlled-drinking self-efficacy may be a very strong predictor of drinking outcome in controlled-drinking studies.
  46. Kavanagh DJ, Sitharthan T, Sayer GP. Prediction of results from correspondence treatment for controlled drinking. Addiction 1996; 91:1539-1545.
  47. Sitharthan T, Kavanagh DJ. Role of self-efficacy in predicting outcomes from a programme for controlled drinking. Drug Alcohol Depend 1990; 27:87-94.
  48. Dawe S, Rees VW, Mattick R, et al. Efficacy of moderation-oriented cue exposure for problem drinkers: A randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002; 70:1045-1050.
  49. Heather N, Brodie J, Wale S, et al. A randomized controlled trial of moderation-oriented cue exposure. J Stud Alcohol 2000; 61:561-570.
  50. Sobell MB, Sobell LC. Problem drinkers: Guided self-change treatment. New York: Guilford Press; 1993.
  51. Sobell LC, Cunningham JA, Sobell MB, et al. Fostering self-change among problem drinkers: A proactive community intervention. Addict Behav 1996; 21:817-833.
  52. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford Press; 1991.
  53. Institute of Medicine. Broadening the base of treatment for alcohol problems. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990.
  54. Sobell LC, Sobell MB, Toneatto T. Recovery from alcohol problems without treatment. In: Heather N, Miller WR, Greeley J, editors. Self-control and the addictive behaviors. New York: Maxwell Macmillan; 1992. pp. 198-242.
  55. Sanchez-Craig M, Lei H. Disadvantages to imposing the goal of abstinence on problem drinkers: An empirical study. Br J Addict 1986; 81:505-512.
  56. Sobell MB, Sobell LC, Leo GI. Does enhanced social support improve outcomes for problem drinkers in guided self-change treatment? J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 2000; 31:41-54.
  57. Andreasson S, Hansagi H, Osterlund B. Short-term treatment for alcohol-related problems: Four-session guided self-change versus one session of advice - a randomized, controlled trial. Alcohol 2002; 28:57-62.
  58. Sobell LC, Sobell MB, Leo GI, et al. Promoting self-change with alcohol abusers: A community-level mail intervention based on natural recovery studies. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2002; 26:936-948.
  59. Sobell MB, Sobell LC. Guiding self-change in treating addictive behaviors. In: Miller WR, Heather N, editors. Treating addictive behaviors: Processes of change. New York: Plenum Press; 1998. pp. 189-202.
  60. Hodgins DC, Leigh G, Milne R, Gerrish R. Drinking goal selection in behavioral self-management treatment of chronic alcoholics. Addict Behav 1997; 22:247-255.
  61. Orford J, Keddie A. Abstinence or controlled drinking in clinical practice: A test of the dependence and persuasion hypotheses. Br J Addict 1986; 81:495-504.
  62. Marlatt GA, Blume AW, Parks GA. Integrating harm reduction therapy and traditional substance abuse treatment. J Psychoactive Drugs 2001; 33:13-21.
  63. Marlatt GA, Somers JM, Tapert SF. Harm reduction: Application to alcohol abuse problems [monograph]. Natl Inst Drug Abuse Res Monogr Ser 1993; 137:144-166.
  64. Buning EC, Van Brussel GH, Van Santen G. Amsterdam's drug policy and its implications for controlling needle sharing. In: Battjes R, Pickens R, editors. Needle-sharing among intravenous drug abusers: national and international perspectives. 1988: Vol. NIDA Monograph No. 80: 59-74. Rockville: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
  65. Marlatt GA, Witkiewitz K. Harm reduction approaches to alcohol use: Health promotion, prevention, and treatment. Addict Behav 2002; 27:867-886.
  66. Marlatt GA, Tucker JA, Donovan DM, Vuchinich RE. Help-seeking by substance abusers: The role of harm reduction and behavioral-economic approaches to facilitate treatment entry and retention. In: Onken LS, Blaine JD, Boren JJ, editors. Beyond the therapeutic alliance: Keeping the drug-dependent individual in treatment. Vol. NIDA Research Monograph No. 165. Rockville: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1997. pp. 44-84.
  67. Kahler CW, Epstein EE, McCrady BS. Loss of control and inability to abstain: The measurement of and the relationship between two constructs in male alcoholics. Addiction 1995; 90:1025-1036.
  68. Marlatt GA. Basic principles and strategies of harm reduction. In: Marlatt GA, editor. Harm reduction: Pragmatic approaches to managing high-risk behaviors. New York: Guilford Press; 1998. pp. 49-66.
  69. O'Malley PM, Johnston LD, Bachman JG. Alcohol use among adolescents. Alcohol Health Res World 1998; 22:85-93.
  70. Wechsler H, Dowdall GW, Maenner G, et al. Changes in binge drinking and related problems among college students between 1993 and 1997. Journal of American College Health 1998: 47:57-68.
  71. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA). Call to action: changing the culture of drinking on US campuses. Task force Report on College Drinking. Washington: DC: NIAAA; 2002.
  72. US Department of Health and Human Services. Results from the 2002 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings http://www.samhsa.gov/oas/NHSDA/2k2NSDUH/Results/2k2results.htm #chap3. [Accessed March 4th, 2004]
  73. Grant BF, Harford TC, Dawson DA, et al. Prevalence of DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence: United States, 1992. Alcohol Health Res World 1994; 18:243-248.
  74. Dawe S, Richmond R. Controlled drinking as a treatment goal in Australia alcohol treatment agencies. J Subst Abuse Treat 1997; 14:81-86.
  75. Wechsler H, Moeykens B, Davenport A, Castillo S, Hansen J. The adverse impact of heavy episodic drinking on other college students. J Stud Alcohol 1995; 56:628-634.
  76. Lynam DR, Milich R, Zimmerman R, et al. Project DARE: No effects at 10-year follow-up. J Consult Clin Psychol 1999; 67:590-593.
  77. McBride N, Midford R, Farrington F, Phillips M. Early results from a school alcohol harm minimization study: The School Health and Alcohol Harm Reduction Project. Addiction 2000; 95:1021-1042.
  78. Botvin GJ, Schinke SP, Epstein JA, et al. Effectiveness of culturally focused and generic skills training approaches to alcohol and drug abuse prevention among minority adolescents: Two-year follow-up results. Psychology of Addictive Behavior 1995; 9:183-194.
  79. Schulenberg J, Maggs JL. Moving targets: Modeling developmental trajectories of adolescent alcohol misuse, individual and peer risk factors, and intervention effects. Applied Developmental Science 2001; 5:237-253.
  80. Marlatt GA, Baer JS, Kivlahan D, et al. Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: Results from a two-year follow-up assessment. J Consult Clin Psychol 1998; 66:604-615.
  81. Dimeff LA, Baer JS, Kivlahan D, Marlatt GA. Brief alcohol screening and intervention for college students (BASICS): A harm reduction approach. New York: Guilford Press; 1999.
  82. Roberts LJ, Neal DJ, Kivlahan DR, Baer JS, Marlatt GA. Individual drinking changes following brief intervention among college students: Clinical significance in an indicated preventive context. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000; 68:500-505.
  83. Baer J, Kivlahan D, Blume A, et al. Brief intervention for heavy-drinking college students: 4-year follow-up and natural history. Am J Public Health 2001; 91:1310-1316.
  84. Murphy JG, Duchnick JJ, Vuchinich RE, et al. Relative efficacy of a brief motivational intervention for college student drinkers. Psychol Addict Behav 2001; 15:373-379.
  85. Squires DD, Hester RK. Computer-based brief intervention for drinkers: The increasing role for computers in the assessment and treatment of addictive behaviors. The Behavior Therapist 2002; 25:59-65.
  86. Squires DD, Hester RK. Using technical innovations in clinical practice: The Drinker's Check-Up software program. Journal of Clinical Psychology 2004; 60:159-169.
    ** This article reviews a software program for problem drinkers, the Drinker's Check-Up, and reports results of three cases obtained from an on-going clinical trial.
  87. McCrady BS, Miller WR. Research on Alcoholics Anonymous: opportunities and alternatives. New Brunswick: Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies; 1993.
  88. Klaw E, Luft S, Humphreys K. Characteristics and motives of problem drinkers seeking help from moderation management self-help groups. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice 2003; 10:384-389.
    * This provides survey data on the characteristics of persons contacting the national Moderation Management information and referral telephone service.
  89. Kishline A. Moderate drinking: The new option for problem drinkers. New York: Sharp Press; 1994.
  90. Kishline A. Moderate drinking: The Moderation Management guide for people who want to reduce their drinking. New York: Crown Trade Paperbacks; 1995.
  91. Sanchez-Craig M, Wilkinson DA, Davila R. Empirically based guidelines for moderate drinking: 1-year results from three studies with problem drinkers. Am J Public Health 1995; 85:823-828.
  92. Humphreys K, Klaw E. Can targeting nondependent problem drinkers and providing internet-based services expand access to assistance for alcohol problems? A study of the moderation management self-help/mutual aid organization. J Stud Alcohol 2001; 62:528-532.
  93. Orford J, Keddie A. Abstinence or controlled drinking in clinical practice: Indications at initial assessment. Addict Behav 1986; 11:17-86.
  94. Rosenberg H. Prediction of controlled drinking by alcoholics and problem drinkers. Psychol Bull 1993; 113:129-139.
  95. Searles JS. Science and fascism: Confronting unpopular ideas. Addict Behav 1993; 18:5-8.
  96. Rind B, Tromovitch P, Bauserman R. A meta-analytic examination of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college samples. Psychol Bull 1998; 124:22-53.
  97. Lilienfeld SO. When worlds collide: Social science, Politics, and the Rind et al. (1998) child sexual abuse meta-analysis. Am Psychol 2002; 57:176-188.