From American Journal of Transplantation

Transplant Glomerulopathy

Posted 05/02/2008

F.G. Cosio; J.M. Gloor; S. Sethi; M.D. Stegall
Author Information

Abstract and Introduction

Abstract

Transplant glomerulopathy (TG) is a histologic entity described more than four decades ago. In the last few years, our understanding of TG has improved significantly. Current evidence supports the postulate that TG is a unique pathologic and pathogenic entity distinct from other forms of chronic allograft injury. Detailed electron microscopic studies have shown basement membrane abnormalities in glomerular and peritubular capillaries, indicating that this is a disease of the entire renal capillary network. Staining biopsies for the complement fragment, C4d, showed positivity in subgroups of TG, suggesting the participation of antidonor antibodies. Consistent with this postulate, the incidence of TG is increased in patients with anti-donor HLA antibodies prior to the transplant. The use of surveillance biopsies has demonstrated that TG can develop during the first few months after transplantation, although it may remain clinically quiescent for several years. However, TG is progressive, leading to reduced graft survival. Recent studies demonstrated a close association between TG and anti-HLA class II antibodies. Current therapies for TG are likely of limited value. However, it is also likely that an improved understanding of TG pathogenesis will result in the development of effective therapies for this form of progressive kidney allograft damage.

Introduction

Transplant glomerulopathy (TG) is a pathologic condition of renal allografts recognized more than four decades ago (reviewed in [1]). TG includes a constellation of histologic features on light and electron microscopies.[2] In this review, we will define TG by the characteristic duplication of glomerular basement membrane (GBM) observed by light microscopy (Figure 1), as recommended by the Banff working group.[3]

Click to zoom
Figure 1.  (click image to zoom)

Left: characteristic glomerular features of TG, note extensive duplication of GBM (arrows). Right: TG is often a focal lesion affecting only some glomeruli (top but not the bottom glomerulus in this slide). By Banff criteria,[17] the diagnosis of TG is based on the identification of duplicated GBM in more than 10% of glomerular capillary loops in the most affected nonsclerotic glomerulus.

     

Evidence is accumulating that TG has a unique pathogenesis that distinguishes it from other chronic pathologic conditions of kidney allografts. TG is relatively rare compared to other lesions encountered in protocol biopsies obtained 1 year after transplantation.[4] However, at least two circumstances highlight the importance of this disease: first, TG is associated with very poor allograft survival and, second, TG is perhaps the first example of a distinct pathologic entity arising from the histologic morass that was first called 'chronic rejection', and then 'chronic allograft nephropathy'. We will argue here that the distinctiveness of TG from other forms of chronic allograft pathologies is given by the coexistence of three features: (i) histologic pattern, (ii) association with the presence of anti-HLA antibodies and (iii) the absence of other conditions that may cause duplication of GBM.

TG is rarely diagnosed clinically within 1 year posttrans-plant. However, recent studies showed that the clinical presentation of TG lags behind the initial histologic stages of the disease.[5] Advanced TG usually is manifest by protein-uria that can be in the nephrotic range, and by progressive loss of kidney function. In our clinical experience and other's, the clinical manifestations of early TG are nonspecific, consisting of progressive, unexplained loss of kidney function, minor proteinuria and mild hypertension.[5-7] Particularly in its early histologic phases, TG is a focal lesion, affecting only a few glomeruli (Figure 1).[3] However, sequential biopsies show progression with increasing percentage of affected capillary loops in an increasing number of glomeruli.[5] TG is associated with poor long-term graft survival (Figure 2). In our series, the variables associated with reduced graft survival included: graft function and proteinuria at diagnosis and the severity of GBM duplication (Banff 'chronic glomerulopathy [cg]' score).

Click to zoom
Figure 2.  (click image to zoom)

Kaplan-Meier plots of death-censored graft survival after conventional transplantation in patients without (—) and with TG (- - -). Data generated from patients who received conventional kidney transplants at Mayo Clinic (N = 582, log-rank, p < 0.0001).[5]

     

Given the insidious clinical presentation of TG, it is likely that the reported incidence of this disorder, which is based on clinical biopsies, is an underestimate of its true incidence (reviewed in[7]). In agreement with this postulate, recent studies of surveillance and clinical biopsies showed that the incidence of TG is higher than expected, affecting 4% of conventional transplants at 1 year posttransplant. Thereafter, the incidence of TG increases progressively, reaching 20% at 5 years.[4,5]

 

References

  1. Hood B, Olander R, Nagy Z, Bergentz SE. Glomerulopathy in the transplanted kidney. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1970; 4: 135-142.
  2. Colvin RB. Antibody-mediated renal allograft rejection: Diagnosis and pathogenesis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 18: 1046-1056.
  3. Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al. The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int 1999; 55: 713-723.
  4. Cosio FG, Grande JP, Wadei H, Larson TS, Griffin MD, Stegall MD. Predicting subsequent decline in kidney allograft function from early surveillance biopsies. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 2464-2472.
  5. Gloor JM, Sethi S, Stegall MD et al. Transplant glomerulopathy: Subclinical incidence and association with alloantibody. Am J Transplant 2007; 9: 2124-2132.
  6. Yamamoto I, Horita S, Takahashi T et al. Glomerular expression of plasmalemmal vesicle-associated protein-1 in patients with transplant glomerulopathy. Am J Transplant 2007; 7: 1954-1960.
  7. Sis B, Campbell PM, Mueller T et al. Transplant glomerulopathy, late antibody-mediated rejection and the ABCD tetrad in kidney allograft biopsies for cause. Am J Transplant 2007; 7: 1743-1752.
  8. Maryniak RK, First MR, Weiss MA. Transplant glomerulopathy: Evolution of morphologically distinct changes. Kidney Int 1985; 27: 799-806.
  9. Monga G, Mazzucco G, Novara R, Reale L. Intertubular capillary changes in kidney allografts: An ultrastructural study in patients with transplant glomerulopathy. Ultrastruct Pathol 1990; 14: 201-209.
  10. de Heer E, Davidoff A, van der Wal A, van Geest M, Paul LC Chronic renal allograft rejection in the rat. Transplantation-induced antibodies against basement membrane antigens. Lab Invest 1994; 70: 494-502.
  11. Mauiyyedi S, Pelle PD, Saidman S et al. Chronic humoral rejection: Identification of antibody-mediated chronic renal allograft rejection by C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12: 574-582.
  12. Regele H, Bohmig GA, Habicht A et al. Capillary deposition of complement split product C4d in renal allografts is associated with basement membrane injury in peritubular and glomerular capillaries: A contribution of humoral immunity to chronic allograft rejection. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13: 2371-2380.
  13. Feucht HE, Schneeberger H, Hillebrand G et al. Capillary deposition of C4d complement fragment and early renal graft loss. Kidney Int 1993; 43: 1333-1338.
  14. Solez K, Colvin RB, Racusen LC et al. Banff '05 Meeting Report: Differential diagnosis of chronic allograft injury and elimination of chronic allograft nephropathy ('CAN'). Am J Transplant 2007; 7: 518-526.
  15. Halloran PF, Schlaut J, Solez K, Srinivasa NS. The significance of the anti-class I response. II. Clinical and pathologic features of renal transplants with anti-class I-like antibody. Transplantation 1992; 53: 550-555.
  16. Trpkov K, Campbell P, Pazderka F, Cockfield S, Solez K, Halloran PF. Pathologic features of acute renal allograft rejection associated with donor-specific antibody. Transplantation 1996; 61: 1586-1592.
  17. Racusen LC, Colvin RB, Solez K et al. Antibody-mediated rejection criteria - an addition to the Banff 97 classification of renal allograft rejection. Am J Transplant 2003; 3: 708-714.
  18. Liptak P, Kemeny E, Morvay Z et al. Peritubular capillary damage in acute humoral rejection: An ultrastructural study on human renal allografts. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 2870-2876.
  19. Gloor JM, Cosio FG, Rea DJ et al. Histologic findings one year after positive crossmatch or ABO blood group incompatible living donor kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 1841-1847.
  20. Campos EF, Tedesco-Silva H, Machado PG, Franco M, MedinaPestana JO, Gerbase-DeLima M. Post-transplant anti-HLA class II antibodies as risk factor for late kidney allograft failure. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 2316-2320.
  21. Langan LL, Park LP, Hughes TL et al. Post-transplant HLA class II antibodies and high soluble CD30 levels are independently associated with poor kidney graft survival. Am J Transplant 2007; 7: 847-856.
  22. Mao Q, Terasaki PI, Cai J et al. Extremely high association between appearance of HLA antibodies and failure of kidney grafts in a five-year longitudinal study. Am J Transplant 2007; 7: 864-871.
  23. Cai J, Terasaki PI, Mao Q et al. Development of nondonor-specific HLA-DR antibodies in allograft recipients is associated with shared epitopes with mismatched donor DR antigens. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 2947-2954.
  24. Muczynski KA, Ekle DM, Coder DM, Anderson SK. Normal human kidney HLA-DR-expressing renal microvascular endothelial cells: Characterization, isolation, and regulation of MHC class II expression. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 1336-1348.
  25. Joosten SA, Sijpkens YW, van Ham V et al. Antibody response against the GBM protein Agrin in patients with transplant glomerulopathy. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 383-393.

Related Links

Author Information

F.G. Cosio,a J.M. Gloor,a S. Sethi,c and M.D. Stegallb

aDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, bDivision of Transplant Surgery and cDivision of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN

Am J Transplant.  2008;8(3):492-496.  ©2008 Blackwell Publishing

 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2008 by Medscape. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.