References for:

[Topics in Advanced Practice Nursing eJournal 3(2), 2003. © 2003 Medscape]

1. McEwen M, Bechtel GA. Characteristics of nursing doctoral programs in the United States. J Prof Nurs. 2000;16:282-292. Abstract
2. Edwardson SR. Re-envisioning doctoral programs in nursing. Program and abstracts of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing 2001 Doctoral Education Conference; February 2001; Sanibel Island, Florida.
3. Division of Nursing, Bureau of Health Professions, Health Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services. 2001. The registered nurse population: National Sample survey of registered nurses. Available at:
   http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/healthworkforce/ rnsurvey/rnss1.htm#Chap2. Accessed April 30, 2003.
4. Fitzpatrick JJ. The case for the clinical doctorate in nursing. Reflect Nurs Leadership Perspect. 2003;1:8-9, 37.
5. Drucker P. The next society. A survey of the near future. Economist. 2001;361:3-20.
6. Everett W. Healthcare of the future. Forces of Change in Nurse Practitioner Education. Program and abstracts of the National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties 28th Annual Conference; April 3-6, 2003; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
7. US Department of Commerce News Release. Health insurance in America. 2002. Available at:
   http://www.census.gov/ Press-Release/www/ 2002/cb02-127.html. Accessed April 30, 2003.
8. Institute of Medicine (IOM). Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Available at:
   http://www.nap.edu/books/ 0309072808/html/. Accessed April 30, 2003.
9. Berlin LE, Sechrist KR. The shortage of doctorally prepared nursing faculty: a dire situation. Nurs Outlook. 2002;50:50-56. Abstract
10. Cooper RA, Getzen TE, McKee HJ, Laud P. Economic and demographic trends signal an impending physician shortage. Health Aff. 2002;21:140-154.
11. American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) and National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF). Master's level nurse practitioner educational programs: findings from the 2000-2001 Collaborative Curriculum Survey. Washington, DC: AACN, NONPF; 2002.
12. Bellack J, Graber D, O'Neil E, Musham C, Lancaster C. Curriculum trends in nurse practitioner programs: current and ideal. J Prof Nurs. 1999;15:15-27. Abstract
13. Marion L. Nursing's vision for primary health care in the 21st century. Washington, DC: American Nurses Association; 1996.
14. Bellack JP. A matter of degree. J Nurs Educ. 2002;41:191-192. Abstract
15. Minnick AF, Halstead L. A data-based agenda for doctoral nursing education reform. Nurs Outlook. 2002;50:24-29. Abstract
16. Mundinger M. Twenty-first century primary care: new partnerships between nurses and doctors. Acad Med. 2002;77:776-780. Abstract
17. Christensen CM, Bohmer R, Kenagy J. Will disruptive innovations cure health care? Harvard Bus Rev. 2002;Sept-Oct:102-112.
18. Institute of Medicine News Release (2003). Health Professions Education: A Bridge to Quality, http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10681.html Accessed April 30, 2003.
19. National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF). Domains and competencies of nurse practitioner practice (Rev.).Washington, DC: NONPF; 2002.
20. American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) and National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF). Nurse practitioner primary care competencies in specialty areas: adult, family, gerontological, pediatric, and women's health. Rockville, Md: US Dept of Health and Human Services, HRSA; 2002.
21. Gladwell M. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. New York: Little Brown & Co; 2000.